Manufacturing Offshore Constanti

Constantinos Markides and Norman Berg, noting in 1988 the growing trend of American manufacturing companies to shift production operations out of the United States, contended that such a strategy is not only not the only alternative to the problems motivating such action, but that in many instances offshore production represents the worst of the alternative strategies.1 Markides and Berg stated that, for many manufacturing companies, an offshore production strategy is adopted as a "quickfix" remedy to a set of problems. The authors held further that the "quickfix" approach is characteristic of the approach to strategy of all too many contemporary American manufacturing managers; an approach that seldom attains longterm solutions to problems.

A primary problem cited by the authors with respect to an offshore manufacturing strategy is that any gains attained through the implementation of such a strategy are almost invariably shortterm in character. Thus, if the primary motive for adopting an offshore manufacturing strategy is to lower wage costs, and wage reductions are the primary goal of most firms relocating production operations to points outside of the United States, any gains attained will be lost as the introduction of the manufacturing operation into a lowwage economy will soon cause wages levels in that economy to begin to rise. In time,

1Constantinos C. Markides and Norman Berg, "Manufacturing Offshore i

. . .
ney for furniture purchases is in short supply. REFERENCE Czinkota, Michael R., Rivoli, Pietra, and Ronkainen, Ilkka A. International Business. Chicago: The Dryden Press, 1989. JOHN BROWN This research analyzes three cases"John Brown (A)," "John Brown (B)," and "John Brown (C)."1 The three cases are concerned with an action by the Reagan Administration in the United States by which the Administration attempted to extend the force of American law to domestic activities in other countries. Specifically, for political reasons, the Reagan Administration wanted to humble the Soviet Union by denying to that country any foreign technology. While the Administration encouraged American corporations to acquire or establish subsidiary companies in friendly foreign countries, the Administration childishly and churlishly expected those American subsidiary companies to follow American law if that law was in conflict with the law of the country in which the subsidiary was located. Not surprisingly, the countries affected objected to the highhanded actions of the Reagan Administration, and the British government (involved in the John Brown case) refused to knuckleunder to the illegal actions of the Reagan Administration.
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Dryden Press, Reagan Administration, European Community, Saudi Arabian, Damar International, Hong Kong, Bush Administration, Flexit International, John Brown, ITC American, free trade, european community, foreign investment, international business, business chicago dryden, dryden press 1989, dryden press, trade agreement, press 1989, chicago dryden, business chicago, free trade agreement, international business chicago, chicago dryden press, reagan administration,
Approximate Word count = 9642
Approximate Pages = 39 (250 words per page)