Probation & Prison Overcrowding
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Prison overcrowding has developed as a major public issue over the past decade. The increase in violent crime in the United States in the 1970s, together a plea bargaining process that often appeared to favor offenders, led to public outcries to "get tougher on crime." Both President Reagan and President Bush tapped this vein of public discontent by successfully, if inaccurately, labeling their opponents as being soft on crime. Other politicians, particularly at the state level, jumped on the tough on crime bandwagon. One result of all of this activity were new sentencing guidelines that mandated prison time for more types of offensesand which also lengthened prison stays. While the politicians were getting tough on crime, however, the politicians and citizensfrom Presidents Reagan and Bush right on down to local politicians and citizens voting in bond electionsneglected in some cases and refused in more cases to increase spending on incarceration facilities at the levels required to meet the increasing demand. The outcome, predictably, was prison overcrowding. Some jurisdictions, in attempts to deal with the problem of prison overcrowding, adopted liberal probation in lieu of incarceration policies for adult nonviolent offenders. Such policies have not always worked as intended, however, because some classes of nonviolent offendersnotably drug offenders were excluded from probation programs. In 1992 as an example, 30 percent of the p
. . .
often creates a situation for the individuals concerned where they are "robbing Peter to pay Paul."25 In recognition of this problem, many states have established payment priority hierarchies. Most jurisdictions place parole and probation fees in a range from the middle to the bottom of the list of applicable payments.
The several states which have adopted programs requiring convicted persons to pay a proportion of the administrative costs associated with their paroles and probations have adopted a variety of payment structures. Some states establish a flat fee level. Others provide a range (most often from $10 to $50 per month), from which the presiding judge is permitted to set the fee level. California requires that presiding judges "determine defendants' ability to pay all or a portion of the reasonable cost . . ., provided that the reasonable cost does not exceed the actual average cost . . ." of administering parole or probation.26 Massachusetts requires that convicted persons on parole or probation pay a monthly supervision fee "equal to not less than one day's net wages nor more than three days' net wages."27 The Massachusetts approach is based solely on the ability to pay principle. Therefore, in Massachusetts, i
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Advantages Disadvantages, Administration January, Reagan Bush, CostBenefit Analysis, Reform Act, Value Value, Analysis Decision, Department Washington, Federal Probation, Costs Community, parole probation, community corrections, convicted persons, community corrections programs, corrections programs, costs associated, paroles probations, nonviolent offenders, pay probation, cost shifting, federal probation, probation 54 1990, convicted persons pay, administration paroles probations, requiring convicted persons,
Approximate Word count = 5644
Approximate Pages = 23 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Probation & Prison Overcrowding
|