Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

NIKE, INC. Introduction This rese

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This research analyzes the strategic position of Nike, Inc. The time frame of the case is 1992.

At the beginning of 1992, Nike was the world leader in the athletic shoe market in terms of overall market share. Nike was not the market share leader in each global regional market, nor was Nike the market share leader in each segment of the athletic shoe market. Nike's primary objective, however, was to become the global market share leaderoverall, in each region, and in each segment.

At the beginning of 1992, Nike was organized as a marketing and research and development company that depended on independent contracting firms to produce the goods developed and marketed by Nike. It is this organizational focus that is at the heart of both Nike's strength and the company's vulnerability. The major problems and issues confronting Nike at the beginning of 1992 were as follows:

1. Marketing and research and development:

a. Distribution. A key Nike objective is the development of control of the distribution of the company's products on a global basis. While the company has made significant gains in this area, problems remain.

b. Product/target market relationship. Nike defines its athletic shoes as performance products, and identifies the target market for these products as persons pursuing fitness regimes. There are indications that Nike may be misreading the

. . .
common stock (Rindos, 1992a, p. 1661). Reebok International went from absolutely nowhere in 1979 to the dominant firm in the athletic shoe market by 1985 (Sedgwick, 1989, pp. 3031). The company achieved this success through the application of three of the procedures employed by Japanese firms in the development of market dominance. These procedures are (1) the creation of opportunity, (2) adapting to latent consumer preferences, and (3) marketing creativity. As stated above, the original Reebok shoe did not sell well in the United States. In 1982, however, Reebok discovered that women were asking shoe retailers for something called an aerobics shoe. Reebok set out to develop such a shoe; thus, adapting its strategy to consumer preferences. Initially, the shoe did not sell much better than had the original Reebok athletic shoe. Reebok then, however, employed marketing creativity; the company placed its new shoe on the feet of the "slim and sexy" instructors of aerobics classes (Sedgwick, 1989, p. 31). Reebok, significantly, did not attempt to place its shoes on television aerobics instructors, but, rather, on those instructors who were in front of actual aerobics classes around the country. Sales zoomed in the lasthalf
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Reebok International, United Rindos, Issue Identification, Europe Nike, Gear Nike, Recommended Actions, Nike Reebok, Production Nike, Republic China, Similarly Nike's, athletic shoe, rindos 1992a 1661, rindos 1992a, 1992a 1661, sedgwick 1989, athletic shoes, rindos 1992b, reebok international, rindos 1992b 1662, 1992b 1662, shoe market, market share, value line investment, line investment survey, sedgwick 1989 31,
Approximate Word count = 2570
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW