Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

White Collar Offenses & Sentencing Decisions The proposed study was designed as a r

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The proposed study was designed as a replication of early research conducted by Wheeler, Weisburd and Bode (1982) which examined several predictor variables for their influence on the sentencing decisions of federal court judges for white collar offenses. This earlier work had shown that high SES offenders receive harsher sentences than lower SES offenders. Given that there are now new federal guidelines mandating prison terms for white collar offenders, a replication was proposed to determine whether sentencing disparity still existed.

Proposed methods involved collection of twenty-one predictor variables from seven federal district court's presentencing reports for defendants convicted of one of eight specific types of white collar crimes.

Zeidner (1994) reported that the new federal crime bill, approved in 1994, will breathe new life into federal law enforcement agencies even as it gives states more money for crime fighting programs. She states that the bill's funding comes from a unique source: savings achieved through personnel cuts at federal agencies. These savings are theoretically to be placed in a newly created trust fund from which state and local governments, as well as federal agencies, will draw annually. The federal government's largest role in carrying out the crime bill will be as a conduit between state and local governments and the trust fund, with some $28 billion in grants authorized over the next 6 years. However, the bi

. . .
al offender. Watkins (1987) states that contemporary legal sanctions are utilized only in those cases in which the public senses a real threat to its collective security and often threat is not fully perceived with respect to white collar crime. For most juries, for example, the crime problem is seen essentially as consisting of violent interpersonal offenses; the criminal law, predictably, has reacted to this form of deviance with its commonplace sanctions. On the other hand, crimes subsumed under the white-collar heading are often only lightly sanctioned even when brought to the attention of prosecuting authorities. The reason for this state of affairs, Watkins (1987) reports is largely a unidimensional theory of crime causation--that crime qua crime is a problem peculiar to the lower socio-economic strata of society. White-collar offenders, coming as they generally do from the more affluent sector, are not perceived as criminals in the classic sense. Because jurors perceive crime as directly associated with a societal stratum that does not include the majority of white-collar criminals, they are reluctant to convict such criminals even when the law has been clearly violated. What is particularly interesting about
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Weisburd Bode, Bernstein Albonetti, Statement Zeidner, Attorneys Defense, According Watkins, Section Summary, Waring Stanton, Rothman Gandossy, Black White, White-Collar Crime, white collar, sentencing decisions, collar offenders, predictor variables, white collar offenders, wheeler weisburd, white collar crimes, socioeconomic status, collar crimes, weisburd bode, collar crime, white collar crime, wheeler weisburd bode, weisburd bode 1982, bode 1982,
Approximate Word count = 4830
Approximate Pages = 19 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW