Seizure of Property by a Foreign Government

The Seizure of Property by a Foreign Government and International Law

This case involves the expropriation of private property owned by an American citizen by the Bosnian government. The American citizen is seeking the attachment of a bank account located in the United States as a step towards securing compensation for the property seized. The Bosnian government claims that United States courts do not have jurisdiction over the Bosnian government because of sovereign immunity and the act of state doctrine.

This memorandum concerns whether a U.S. court can attach a United States bank account belonging to the Bosnian government in order to secure a source of compensation. This memorandum presents the argument that a U.S. court does have jurisdiction over such a bank account in a situation where a foreign government has appropriated private property belonging to an American citizen. Under United States law, foreign governments enjoy sovereign immunity for their acts. This is a traditional part of customary international law. However, there is some question as to whether the expropriation of property by a State is a sovereign act which is immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of other states. Under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), a U.S. court can acquire jurisdiction over a foreign state within the provisions set out by the Act. 90 Stat. 2891, 28 U.S.C. �� 1602-1611.

Prior to the enactment of the FSIA, the absolute rule in U.S. law was that a forei

Related Essays

Intellectual property rights .... money because of a successful seizure of infringing .... legal system that respects property rights and .... against the foreigners, including foreign companies (Senser 9 .... (2903 12 )

International Business Questions .... When seizure of foreign assets occurs without .... process whereby the government takes over private property. .... was formerly supportive of foreign investment uses .... (1483 6 )

Egypt and Saudi Arabia This .... to private domestic and foreign capitalists and Western foreign aid. .... provided "additional guarantees against arbitrary arrest [and] seizure of property" (80 .... (2681 11 )

SAUDI ARABIA AND EGYPT This .... to private domestic and foreign capitalists and Western foreign aid. .... provided "additional guarantees against arbitrary arrest [and] seizure of property" (80 .... (2681 11 )

Restructuring Russian Society .... accessible to international investment and foreign commerce have .... experienced the scale of property privatization and .... evident is the wholesale seizure of public .... (2840 11 )

re money damages are sought against a foreign state for personal injury or death, or damage to or loss of property ... occurring in the United States and caused by the tortious acts of the foreign state or its omission or of its official or employee while acting within the scope of his office or employment .... � 1605(a)(5). The two most important of these exceptions for the purposes of this case are the second and third. An activity by a foreign government does not qualify as an act of state if that act is a part of a commercial activity. � 1605(a)(2). Courts have interpreted this provision rather broadly, labelling many different kinds of acts as commercial activities. For instance, the purchase of cement by a foreign government for use in the construction of military barracks is a commercial activity under the FSIA. Texas Trading and Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, 647 F.2d 300 (2d Cir. 1981). The chartering of a ship to deliver grain from a U.S. food grain program to a wholly-owned foreign state company was held to be a commercial activity. Gemini Shipping, Inc. v. Foreign Trade Organization for Chemicals and Foodstuff, 647 F.2d 317 (2d Cir. 1981). In this case, an argument can be made that almost any

Category: Government - S