Work Team Outcomes Review of the Literature This liter

Fluxman (1999) reported that teamwork in organizations is an important trend with the increasing technological innovations that are taking place. This author used the automotive industry to provide an example of teamwork models found worldwide. The Japanese Team Concept and the Scandinavian Team Concept emerged in the last two decades. These approaches reorganize production work into teams. These models redesign jobs for integrated work teams in order to increase worker motivation, output quality, and productivity. Horizontal and vertical integration are utilized with task autonomy. Team-based systems require employee training and plant redesign and imply long-term commitment to employees.

Fluxman (1999) stated that for the Japanese model the work teams are assigned a cohesive set of tasks that take place along a moving assembly line (with modern approaches including unpaced asynchronous mixed-model assembly lines).

. . .
e essentials needed to make the change; poor presentation of the team concept to employees; poor handling lower management resistance; and lack of training for successful teams. Employees need to understand the benefits of team approaches since they typically mistrust teams. Job security, employee politics, pay considerations, and other rewards are issues that must be discussed. Lower management may resist teams since the pose a threat to power and job security and they require a smooth transition to new roles. Extensive training in interpersonal and task skills is needed for employees expected to perform in a team-based environment. Group commitment and success rely on employees being kept informed, trained, and able to remain autonomous. Janz, Colquitt, and Noe (1997) reported that the increased use of work teams in organizations has resulted in a focus on team effectiveness factors. However findings have resulted in gaps since most studies focused on blue-collar workers only and even fewer studies examined teams with knowledgeable workers (those with higher education). Further studies lack an examination of how variables interact with each other. Janz et al. therefore studied worker team effectives and its association
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Corning Incorporated, Van Aken, Colquitt Noe, Sharp Kagioglou, Pneumafil Corporation, Corporation Technological, Trumble Diaz, Team Concept, Dunphy Bryant, Development Miller, et al, self-directed teams, 1999 reported, 1997 reported, et al 1997, team effectiveness, stages development, fluxman 1999, team building, al 1997, team approach, van aken 2001, irani et al, janz et al, groesbeck van aken,
Approximate Word count = 6099
Approximate Pages = 24 (250 words per page)