Social-cognitive theory
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Social-cognitive theory offers an agentic perspective in which the individual is a self-organizing, proactive, self-reflection and self-regulating entity (Bandura). It proposes that belief in self-efficacy is the most focal and pervasive aspect of human agency, and that unless people believe they can achieve the desired effect and prevent undesired ones from happening, they will have little incentive to act. The interdependence of human functioning by placing a premium on the exchange of collective agency through shared beliefs in the power to produce the effect by collective action is central to how people live their lives. People are partly a product of their environment, and partly responsible for creating it. They can influence the course of events and take part in shaping their lives by their capabilities in human agency. Human agency is essentially individual agency (Bandura). In many instances, the environment is created by the social structure and so individual agency can only be expressed by the exercise of proxy agency. Proxy agency is often used in the control of areas in which individuals do not have the time or expertise to participate, or the influence needed to have an effect, so they delegate that influence by proxy to the social structure in terms of their political representatives who can get things done. Social-cognitive theory extends the concept of human agency to collective agency, which is often the only way an individual can achieve the e
. . .
the poor seize the goods of the wealthy by force, you could measure the size of the wealthy and the poor groups in a society, and measure the income inequality between the two, and predict its revolutionary potential of the society, discounting the elements of repression which keep the poor in place by force. This would be a social structure theory, but it discounts the effects of the elements of chance, contingency and personality on deciding events.
Many social theorists have tried to examine how the parts of society interrelate (Roberts). Filmer and Locke analyzed family and politics as part of society, but came to different conclusions. Filmer argued that political power derives from family power, whereas Locke believed that paternal or parental power should not be confused with political power, or either of them be confused with despolitical power. Hegel suggested society consisted of three parts: the State (political), Civil Society (the economy) and Private Society (the family). He saw them as three distinct entities. Engels also had this view of society.
Talcott Parsons, the U.S. sociologist and Structural Functionalist, believed that society is create by individuals, and that a social system emerges from
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Political Studies, Bandura People, , Structural Functionalist, Week Political, Filmer Locke, social structure, Albert Exercise, Jane Diversity, individual agency, Private Society, political science, june 2005, 6 june, Durkheim Bias, 6 june 2005, human agency, undated 6, undated 6 june, individual agency social, agency social, agency social structure, social structures, political power, human agency collective,
Approximate Word count = 1470
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Social-cognitive theory
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
