Decision-Making Process Decision-making is a diff

Modern management theory has come up with several approaches designed to insure that problems are identified and framed correctly, the options are clearly delineated, and decisions are made according to the best information, with the most acceptable cost (or risk) to benefit alternative as the outcome.

While these approaches are far from foolproof, they do eliminate many of the pitfalls of ad hoc decision-making lacking a structured procedure. Even if you don't believe that the movement of the stars in the sky affect personal human destiny, it is enjoyable to have your horoscope done for the simple fact that it deals with many aspects of personality that almost anyone enjoys thinking about. In a similar manner, using the seven-step decision-making process focuses your attention on virtually all the elements necessary to consider in order to make a good decision, although it does not guarantee the best solution will be adopted.

We will use a hot-button conflict as a case study, and will examine the problem and possible outcomes from several different problem-solving points of view.

In their book The Principalship, Drake and Roe recount an apparently hypothetical incident in which materials relating to homosexuality were displayed by two teachers in their classrooms, resulting in complaints by

. . .
eye to how we might come up with a more balanced solution to the gay rights issue. Three general kinds of decision making processes or theories have been described in the literature on management, and they apply at least potentially to a wide variety of organizational behavior, from corporations to schools. The traditional manner of making organizational decisions can be termed the rational approach, although when we examine it more closely, we find that its greatest drawbacks are the shortcomings of rationality itself, at least when considering problems where there are significant limitations of information. One business website concerning management issues outlines a six-step process to arrive at supposedly rational decisions, and then offers a critique of their downsides (www.mgmtguru.com). The first step is to define the problem. This is more dicey than one might think in the case of the gay materials in the school. At first the principal and the school board thought of the problem as mollifying parental critics who objected to any mention of homosexuality in the schools on the presumed grounds that it might corrupt the students. But when the offended teacher went to the union and the school superintendent with his
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Evangelical Christians, , Drake Roe, Anti-Defamation League, Columbius Ohio, school board, gay rights, school system, students faculty free, legal ethical, heuristic approach, gay-oriented materials, students faculty, rational approach, faculty free,
Approximate Word count = 1442
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)