Moral Implications of Dumping
This is an excerpt from the paper...
"Dumping" is the practice of American firms exporting goods which have been declared dangerous or which have been banned altogether from domestic markets (Shaw, 34). The practice is typically undertaken by companies which have invested a considerable amount of their resources into the product, and who are trying to recover part of that investment. This research is concerned with the moral questions which arise from dumping, and considers whether dumping can be morally justified.Dumping can take many forms. Shaw cites the recall of pajamas containing the chemical Tris, which, according to study, caused kidney cancer in children (Shaw, 33, 34). In this instance, a number of small companies who manufactured clothing treated with the now-banned chemical faced mounting inventories and severe financial losses. In order to absorb the losses, some companies sold the pajamas to exporters who marketed the goods overseas where Tris-treated garments were not banned. The manufacturers suffered less severe losses than if they had not sold to the exporters, the exporters made a profit on the deal, and children overseas were exposed to the carcinogen Tris. Dumping can assume more sinister forms, as well. Wheat and barley in Iraq were treated with a US-banned fungicide in 1972. As a result, 400 died and 5,000 became ill. Baby pacifiers which have been implicated in choking deaths have been shipped overseas, and the American government sponsored
. . .
gh the risk of cancer? If education levels were high and people were able to make informed choices based on their family history and predisposition to cancer, there might well be a number of individuals who would choose to risk the cancer over the risk of a severely burned child. However, with low literacy rates and no system of informed consent, this decision must be made by governments, and by the exporters of the Tris clothing.
The moral question becomes more acute when considering the use of the Dalkon Shield. This contraceptive device is known to cause pelvic inflammation, blood poisoning, spontaneous abortions, tubal preganancies and uterine perforations (Shaw, 34). Some deaths are considered the direct result of the contraceptive's use. Despite its known risks, the device is used in a number of American-sponsored population control programs.
The Dalkon Shield puts women at these countries at increased risk of illness and death. Yet a number of American and overseas officials support the contraceptive's use. These officials argue that withdrawing the contraceptive will result in more pregnancies in societies which can ill afford significant increases in population. They point to decreasing literacy rates, high infa
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Third World, Dalkon Shield, Returning Tris, Dumping Dumping, United Shaw, Notification System, , Morally Justified, Tris Dumping, Commission CPSC, dalkon shield, notification system, risk cancer, dumping morally justified, morally justified, shaw 34, tris clothing, dumping morally, population control, health officials, children overseas, children overseas exposed, population control programs, outweigh risk cancer,
Approximate Word count = 1445
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Moral Implications of Dumping
|