Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

THE COSMETICS INDUSTRY The cosmet

This is an excerpt from the paper...

THE COSMETICS INDUSTRY: AN ANALYSIS

The cosmetics industry in the United States produces and markets both cosmetics and toiletries (Royce, 1991). The major players in the industry are Alberto Culver, Avon, Chesebrough Ponds, Faberge, Gillette, International Flavors and Fragrances, Noxell, and Revlon, although not all of these firms are independent entities (Standard & Poor's, 1990).

The history of the cosmetics industry can likely be traced to some of the very earliest days of civilization. It was in the lasthalf of the nineteenth century, however, when toiletries and cosmetics began to be produced and marketed on a mass scale, as opposed to being concocted in essentially local establishments. In 1880, the country's largest cosmetic firm, Avon, was founded (Moskowitz, Katz & Levering, 1985).

Industry sales in 1990 were $11.4 billion, which represented a 9.6 percent increase over the $10.4 billion of 1989. From 1987 through 1990, industry sales grew by 34.1 percent, and by 1993 should near $15 billion, a gain of 31.6 percent over 1990 levels (Royce, 1991).

Operating margins in the industry are relatively high, with 17.5 percent being recorded in 1990. Operating margins increased annually from 16.1 percent recorded in 1987, and are expected to reach 19 percent by 1993 (Royce, 1991).

Net profit in the industry is also strong. The net profit recorded in 1990 was 7.5 percent, up from 6.8 percent in 1987. By 1993, industry ne

. . .
group with a high potential to be adversely affected by bar coding packaging is premiumbrand cosmetics. It is possible that any gains made through increased efficiency at the retail level accruing from the use of bar codes on the packaging of these products may be offsetall or in partby a decrease in product demand, as a consequence of changing consumer perceptions of the quality/ price relationships of the affected products. A premiumbrand cosmetic products refers to those products in the 95th or higher price percentile. Thus, such perfumes as "Chanel," "Joy," and "Giorgio's" are included within the definition. It has been found that consumers do not generally resist the use of bar codes on the packaging of premiumbrand cosmetics. Resistance is strong, however, to the placing of bar codes on product labels, and on package tops. It has also been found that demand for premiumbrand cosmetics would likely suffer to a statistically significant extent if bar coding were placed on product labels and on package tops. Packaging, thus, is an important factor in the marketing of prestige brand cosmetics. Distribution Shifts in the distribution of cosmetics are resulting in changes in the industry's product mix. Cosmetic
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Standard Poor's, Katz Levering, Product Innovation, Distribution Shifts, Kay Cosmetics, Joy Giorgio's, Ms Ash, Description Structure, Gillette Tambrands, Mary Kay, royce 1991, standard poor's, poor's 1990, standard poor's 1990, mary kay, cosmetics industry, kay cosmetics, mary kay cosmetics, cosmetics toiletries, longterm debt equity, department stores, bar codes, public recognition, return total capital, percent royce 1991,
Approximate Word count = 1534
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW