Autonomous Regimes
This is an excerpt from the paper...
1. One of the good things about Lapidoth's book is that it makes a compelling case in favor of autonomy. Heterogeneity is perceived as positive. Certain groups have a desire to preserve their culture, and this should be encouraged rather than discouraged. Autonomy is a means to allow the expression of cultural diversity while simultaneously helping to achieve peace. The author advocates autonomy because it is a flexible approach with proven results, even in situations where deep-seated differences appear to offer little hope of peaceful resolution. Another good thing about the book is that the author provides balance for her argument in favor of autonomy. She presents cases of failed autonomy as well as successes. Although autonomy has been largely successful, the approach does have its pros and cons, its critics and supporters. Autonomy requires compromise and a willingness by both parties to see the process succeed: "Autonomy is not a panacea, but only a framework that can constitute an adequate compromise if the parties are looking for one" (Lapidoth, 1996, p. 204). Central governments are sometimes reluctant to grant autonomy to minority groups based on a variety of fears, such as the risk of intervention of a foreign state to which members of the autonomous group have affinity. Likewise, minority groups usually see themselves as being compromised by autonomy, preferring complete secession. Even when both parties bargain in good faith, autonomy has it pitfall
. . .
ails in others.
3. Autonomy is important because it can help to solve some of the problems inherent in the coexistence of minority peoples within dominant cultures. Autonomy promotes peace: "Autonomy serves to secure the rights of minorities, of indigenous populations, and of peoples seeking self-determination; it aims to ease ethnic tensions" (Lapidoth, 1996, p. 4).
Easing ethnic tensions is particularly important in modern times. An increase in ethnic and national consciousness is apparent in many countries throughout the world. Establishing regimes of autonomy can satisfy the demands of minority groups for empowerment while simultaneously preserving existing states.
4. The most important purpose of the book is to provide guidance to international leaders who are attempting to build autonomy. The concept of autonomy is analyzed, as is a number of cases. Cases of success are provided as well as cases of failure because often the lessons of failure are more easily comprehended than the lessons of success.
A related purpose of the book is to provide definitions on a variety of terms related to autonomy. An understanding of these terms is essential for effective communication between central authorities and groups
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Quebec Canada, According Lapidoth, , Security Council, American Revolution, United America, International Peace, Canada Quebec, Institute Peace, Jewish Hebrew, lapidoth 1996, personal autonomy, territorial autonomy, lapidoth's book, peaceful resolution, institute peace, purpose book, united institute peace, autonomy personal, population minority, regime autonomy, autonomy personal autonomy, institute peace press, minority constitutes majority, dominant authority minority,
Approximate Word count = 2761
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Autonomous Regimes
|