| |
| |
Decision Making Within Organizations |
|
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |

Decision making in organizations has been described as a process of behavior with the economic model (or total rationality) at one extreme, and with the social model (or complete irrationality) at the other extreme (Kimberly and Rottman, 1987, pp. 596619). This description implies that only irrational decision making accords human values precedence over economic values. In the organizational environments of the 1990s, leaders must find some middle ground between these extremes, for it is evident that neither set of values can be ignored. In many organizations, managers have been confronted with the tasks of making severe, undesirable, and unpleasant cuts of personnel and services in a hasty manner, because, in part, they failed to heed economic values in earlier decisions. Similarly, organizations have often been forced to retract decisions, and to act in confusing manners, in chaotic situations, because, in part, they failed to heed human values in reaching earlier decisions. A better approach to decision making is obviously required by many organizations as they contemplate the demands of the future. In the last quarter of the twentieth century, it is recognized that the application of specific approaches to decisionmaking must, to some extent, consider leadership styles, personalities, and organizational requirements (Lenz and Engledow, 1986, pp. 6989). First, in the context of organizational conflict which often develops at the time of change implementation
Related Essays
Group Decision Making .... In American organizations, nominal group decision making is .... Collective decision making, to the Japanese, means extensive .... of the managers within an organization .... (3203 13 )
Group Decision Making TABLE OF CONTENTS .... social factors in decision making. The balance between these two sets of values will vary between organizations, and will vary within organizations over time. .... (4867 19 )
Decision Making Theory & Process .... and social factors in decision making. The balance between these two sets of values will vary between organizations, and will vary within organizations over 5W .... (3509 14 )
Leadership in Organizations .... social factors in decision making. The balance between these two sets of values will vary between organizations, and will vary within organizations over time. .... (1634 7 )
EMPOWERING EMPLOYEES IN ORGANIZATIONS This res .... social factors in decision making. The balance between these two sets of values will vary between organizations, and will vary within organizations over time. .... (4431 18 )

individuals is much greater than that for a single decision maker (McGrath, 1991, pp. 363392). Additionally, group participation in the process typically results in a better understanding of the decision reached.
The major disadvantage to group decision making results from the presence in an organization of social pressures (Szilagy and Wallace, 1992, p. 111). Superior/subordinate relationships within an organization, as an example, may result in no meaningful participation on the part of a subordinate. The quality of group decisions has also been questioned, because, often, consensus is viewed as a substitute for a thorough evaluation of the quality of the decision. The group decision making process may also be subverted by the dominance of a single individual, and the development of a competitive winlose culture among participants. While not being cause for the elimination of group decision making in organizational settings, the problems which may characterize group decision making must be effectively addressed within an organization, if effective decisions are expected to derive from a group decisionmaking process.
TeamBased Management
Teamdevelopment promotes the idea that individuals who have working relationsh
Category: Business - D
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Mahler Nicholson, Hickson Wilson, Schilit Paine, Larson LaFasto, SMWTs Owens, Kimberly Rottman, SMWTs Barton, Bales Isenberg, Szilagy Wallace, Hart Schlesinger, 1991 pp, organizational structure, nicholson 1989, gortner mahler, mahler nicholson 1989, gortner mahler nicholson, mahler nicholson, nicholson 1989 110, quality improvement, 1989 110, informal organization, owens 1991, owens 1991 pp, pp 5859, 1991 pp 5365,
= 2016
= 8 (250 words per page)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
| |
Click Here
to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
"Thank you for making such a high quality site! Your papers are the best I have seen around"
|
Debbie B. |
| |
|
"Your site was very helpful and gave me the details I needed in order to complete my essay!!!"
|
Mike F. |
| |
|
"This site is an excellent vehicle for quick referrences. Thanks a bunch!"
|
Carla T. |
| |
|
"Great site, I got a lot of new ideas I would have never thought of before."
|
Nate A. |
| |
|
"I love this site!!!"
|
Marie H. |
| |
|
| |
|
|