Juvenile Courts & Juvenile Crime
Several recommendations have
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Several recommendations have been made for changes in the juvenile courts without abolishing them altogether. Juveniles are protected by International Law from execution, and it has become jus cogens nor (The Death, 2005). Th United States, one of the few countries to condone the practice, finally outlawed it in March last year, declaring it unconstitutional. This brought to an end the U.S. reputation as the most egregious violator of the international ban. The practice of sentencing juveniles to life imprisonment without parole is accepted almost as international law, but the United States began the practice in the 1990s, even though the Convention on the Rights of Children (CRC) prohibits the practice. The US is again the most egregious violator of the ban, having roughly 7,000 juveniles serving life sentences at present. The Human Rights Commission is strongly in favor of keeping the juvenile justice system and abolishing the death penalty for juveniles, and urges the United States to abolish the sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole for juveniles. The numbers of juveniles serving life sentences without the chance of parole in the US is due to legislation allowing juveniles to be sentenced as adult, with 40 states and the District of Columbia passing laws allowing such trials between 1992 and 1995 (The Death, 2005). Racial minorities are disproportionately represented among juveniles serving life sentences without parole
. . .
stunts their moral development.
Treating juveniles differently from adults is essential for the reasons pointed out by Feld (2006). Trying juveniles as adults and sentencing them to imprisonment with adults may do more harm than good in that they will learn more criminal behavior by associating with hardened criminals in prison. The ideal would be to run them through the regular criminal courts, as Feld suggests, with different sentences being handed down according to their moral culpability development by age, and then housing them in separate institutions away from adult criminals where they can continue their education and be prepared for their return to society.
2. Religion, Family and Combating Juvenile Crime
Delinquency and violence stem from a variety of social problems which include child abuse and neglect, alcohol and drug abuse, family violence, participation in gangs, a lack of education and early sexual activity (Alvarado and Kumpfer, 2000). If these problems are not adequately addressed and dealt with in the family environment, they may lead to delinquency and violence in juveniles, and other criminal behavior. The family is the first socializing environment for a child and so it is vitally important th
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Alvarado Kumpfer, Juveniles Feld, Benda Corwyn, District Columbia, Supreme Court, Baier Wright, Rights Commission, President Bush, Th United, Retrieved Feb, feld 2006, juvenile crime, religion crime, kumpfer 2000, alvarado kumpfer, alvarado kumpfer 2000, juvenile justice, serving life sentences, 9 2006, feb 9, sentencing juveniles, adult sentence, juveniles serving life, juvenile justice system, feb 9 2006,
Approximate Word count = 1514
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Juvenile Courts & Juvenile Crime
Several recommendations have
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
