The Alabama Auto Industry Colan

Colander (2004) has noted that when governments set economic policies, they are generally faced with the necessity of making important and consequential trade-offs between competing values, potential benefits and drawbacks, and outcomes. In addition, public economic policies are responsive to (and informative of) public responses to state governance as well as local economies that will either grow or stagnate as a consequence of such decisions. In this brief essay, the case of the state of Alabama's decision in 2002 to actively pursue development of the automobile industry within the state will be considered. It will be argued that Brooks (2002) is correct in noting that Alabama's decision to offer Mercedes Benz huge financial incentives to locate a production facility in the state, Alabama also undertook financial programs that resulted in reductions in services that are also as vital to economic growth as the creation of new jobs.

Colander (2004) describes the production possibilities model as a mechanism which depicts opportunity costs in tandem with the anticipated benefits of producing selected goods vis-a-vis other goods. Basically, a production possibility curve is a curve that measures the maximum combination of outputs that can be obtained from a given number of inputs. What this suggests is that opportunities are accompanied by costs and that whenever a government or other entity elects to implement one policy to c

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Mercedes Benz, Motor Company, Industry Colander, Motown Alabama, Toyota Honda, Mississippi Georgia, References Brooks, brooks 2002, colander 2004, Journal April, mercedes benz, Alabama Brooks, Jim Fulsom, motor company, brooks 2002 alabama, 2002 alabama, pay millions, economic policies, tax revenues, alabama's decision, described colander 2004, production possibility curve, production possibilities model, possibility curve,
Approximate Word count = 1138
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)