The Dred Scott case
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The Dred Scott case was one which had a major impact on bringing the nation nearer to war (Mullane 132-133). Dred Scott was a slave owned by army surgeon Dr. John Emerson, and accompanied him on a when he left his Missouri home to spend several years in Illinois and the Louisiana Purchase Territory (now Minnesota). Illinois at the time was a free state under the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, as was the Louisiana Purchase Territory, but according to the terms of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, Missouri was a slave state. After they returned to Missouri, Dr. Emerson died, and Dred Scott sued Emerson's wife for his freedom. The Circuit Court of St. Louis County sided with Scott, but the Missouri Supreme Court reversed the decision by a ruling which said that just because Scott had resided in a free state, that did not make him a free man. Emerson's brother, John F. A. Sanford of New York bought Scott for the purpose of bringing a case in federal court which, according to the Constitution, had the power to decide cases between citizens of different states (Mullane 132-133). However, in 1856, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney of the Supreme Court delayed the case for a year to avoid giving a ruling in a presidential election year. The outcome of the eventual trial showed a deep division surrounding the issue of slavery, but the prevailing opinion was that of Chief Justice Taney who argued that Scott did not gain his freedom just by traveling into free territory, and that he co
. . .
such a Government which declared him to be an inferior an degraded being was to denounce and repudiate it, and to do what they could by all proper means to bring it into contempt.
Purvis' ideas were echoed by C. L. Redmond of Salem, Mass., who declared that for colored people to persist in claiming citizenship under the United States Constitution after this would be mean-spirited and craven (Mullane 138). He said that colored people owed no allegiance to a country that treated them like dogs and ground them under its heels. Redmond said that the time for patriotism was gone, that he was no longer proud that the first blood spilled in the American Revolution was that of a colored man, Attucks, and that he was no longer proud that his grandfather fought in th revolutionary war. He now believed the liberty purchased by the blood of colored men was now used to enslave and degrade them, and he loathed a government that could perpetrate such outrages on its people. He denounced the American Union in strong terms. The resolutions of Purvis and Remond were passed.
Women were also involved in the struggle for freedom of the American slaves. Sojourner Truth is one of the best known (Mullane 184-185). Truth was a strong proponen
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Dred Scott, Sojourner Truth, Worcester Massachusetts, Baumfree Dutch, Supreme Court, American Revolution, United Constitution, Justice Taney, Charles Remond, Missouri Compromise, colored people, dred scott, sojourner truth, dred scott major, purchase territory, inferior degraded, equal rights, free territory, missouri compromise, louisiana purchase, missouri compromise 1820, louisiana purchase territory, declared inferior degraded, declared inferior,
Approximate Word count = 1271
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The Dred Scott case
|