Theatre vs. DVD
The issue of whether vie
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The issue of whether viewers prefer to watch a first run film in a theatre or wait until it's released on DVD and watch it at home is very much on the minds of movie moguls today. "The $64 billion question in Hollywood these days is what to do about collapsing the boundary between a movie's theatrical and video releasełthe so-called video window", writes Edward Jay Epstein (Slate, August 1, 2005).Generally speaking, viewing films in a movie theatre is a better experience than renting a DVD version to watch at home. First, I'll discuss the pros and cons of theatres. Then I'll do the same for watching DVDs at home. Finally, I'll mention some circumstances where the thesis of this paper does not hold true, and the option of watching at home is preferable. The advantages of watching a film in a theatre designed for that purpose are obvious. First of all, the image size is immense compared to even the largest sized home television set. This adds immeasurably to the intimacy and immediacy of the experience. It's as if the film is a monumental sized super-reality which dominates the viewer's consciousness. Then there's the sound. It's generally played through large high-quality, expensive speakers mounted throughout the theatre, and when panning is used it seems to move around. Both the sound and picture are enhanced by projection in a dark, soundproof room where distracting, extraneous visual and auditory stimulae do not intrude. The seats tend to be comfortable and the screen
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Watching DVD, Finally I'll, , Slate August, august 1 2005, slate august, Jay Epstein, slate august 1, Edward Jay, edward jay epstein, 1 2005, watch home, august 1, jay epstein, sound it's, film theatre, home viewing, theatre attendance, edward jay,
Approximate Word count = 845
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)
|