An Assessment of Schumpeter's Capitalist Transition

AN ASSESSMENT OF SCHUMPETER'S CAPITALIST TRANSITION: AN ESSAY

Joseph Schumpeter, in Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, as well as in other works, wrote of an eventual transition of capitalism into socialism through a gradual evolutionary process. Schumpeter's focus throughout his career as an economic theorist was on innovation and its role in society. Thus, when he predicted that a transition eventually would occur from capitalism to socialism, it was not so much a thought that such an evolutionary transition would occur because capitalism became more humane, but rather just the opposite.

In Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, Schumpeter argued that corporations eventually would come to dominate life under the capitalist system. Under monopoly capitalism, corporations would place less of an emphasis on price and would therefore compete primarily on the bases of organizational and technological innovation. Eventually, Schumpeter (189) wrote that this competition based upon organizational and technological innovation would send "gales of creative destruction" through the economic system which eventually would result in a dissolution with capitalism on the part of society and the eventual transition of capitalism into socialism.

Schumpeter was not the first to view capitalism as a step along the way in the evolution of the economic system. Karl Marx before Schumpeter viewed economics as an evolutionary system of thought and Immanuel Wallerstein after Schumpeter co

Related Essays

Social Class & Political Trust in the US .... Schumpeter's notion of political support has been accepted by .... In other words, the assessment of the respondent's social class by .... Barnes, S., & Kasse, M. (1979 .... (3845 15 )

The Entrepreneurial Process .... linked entrepreneurship to economic development (Schumpeter, 1934), however .... to make a reasonable assessment of its .... study was each founder(s) and development .... (9547 38 )

mental organizations (NGOs), as well as for some officials from developing countries. NGOs have no access to economic committees of the WTO or the OECD. Developing countries and CITs have little access to the OECD. These parties may feel disillusioned about the prospects of a counter-initiative because of the collapse of 15 years of talk about a United Nations Code of Conduct for TNCs, and because of the imperviousness of both the OECD and the WTO to public pressure. Nevertheless, NGO pressure to regulate TNC activity has escalated. There are now strong emerging concerns about the proposed MAI initiative (Karl 25). The proposed MAI limits and restricts what governments can do to regulate foreign investment. The proposed MAI, however, does not discuss standards governing the conduct of international business organizations. This approach will create an agreement on investment with rights to TNCs but with no obligations for TNCs; and obligations for national governments but with no rights for national governments. The proposed MAI would be the first binding international agreement negotiated by the OECD, which traditionally has served a research arm for the finance ministers of member countries. The proposed MAI (A Multi

Category: Economics - A