Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Airport Noise Management

This is an excerpt from the paper...

This study examined the development and application of urban planning policies designed to provide for noise abatement in the vicinity of metropolitan area airports. Four research questions were investigated through the conduct of the study. These research questions were as follows:

1. What approach to local planning involvement (contingency valuation measurement or local authority veto) in the airport noise abatement process in the United States would lead to the highest level of social benefits over social costs?

2. What approach to local planning involvement (contingency valuation measurement or local authority veto) in the airport noise abatement process in the United States would lead to the highest level of economic benefits over economic costs?

Based on the research findings, a conclusion was drawn that the CVM approach to local planning participation in the airport noise abatement process is superior to a local authority veto option. The CVM approach could establish non-use values at a level that would cause governments and air transportation companies to opt for the distant-siting of regional airports.

This study examined the development and application of urban planning policies designed to provide for noise abatement in the vicinity of metropolitan area airports. Non-planning policies relevant to the planning process also were examined. The problem statement, study purpose, research questions, and conceptual definitio

. . .
ble (McGarity, 1983, p. 167). In essence, the Kalder-Hicks approach is in theory applied as a means causing beneficiaries of a specific economic decision to pay for the social capital employed for their private benefit. There are two principal regulatory approaches that are employed to bring about this situation in which beneficiaries of economic decisions are made to pay for the social capital employed for their benefit (McGarity, 1983, p. 168). The first of the two approaches is the media-quality-based approach. In this approach, as it is applied in environmental protection, specific standards are established for the social capital resource involved. If water is the social capital resource involved, a standard of purity, or cleanliness, for water would be specified, without regard to the costs associated with such standards, and without regard to the technological feasibility of attaining such standards (McGarity, 1983, p. 160). The second of these regulatory approaches is the technology-based approach, in which an appropriate environmental protection technology is specified, without regard to the quality of the media concerned (McGarity, 1983, p. 160). In this approach, specific standards of water purity, as an example
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Airport Noise, Lake Michigan, Ekelund Hebert, Congress FAA, Noise Abatement, International Airport, , Research Questions, United Kingdom, Port Seattle, noise abatement, airport noise, environmental protection, research questions, airport noise abatement, social benefits, noise levels, social costs, mcgarity 1983, local authority veto, economic decision, 1991 pp, contingency valuation measurement, specific economic decision, noise abatement process,
Approximate Word count = 7588
Approximate Pages = 30 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$