Advantages and Disadvantages of Team Decision Making

Page Count: 9
Length: 2164 Words

Advantages and Disadvantages of Team Decision Making

Self-managing work teams are being formed in business organizations that want to achieve greater flexibility, empower employees in making decisions, and maximize the use of their employees' intellectual and creative abilities (Wageman, 1997). These work groups are seen as having the capacity to improve, often quite significantly, organizational performance, learning and adaptability. They are also viewed as strengthening employees' commitment to the company.

It is the purpose of this report to review the literature on team decision making to identify its strengths and weaknesses, advantages and disadvantages. This problem - the relative effectiveness of team-centered decision making - will be explored both theoretically as well as with respect to empirical studies. It will be argued that team decision-making is most viable in work settings in which the corporate culture supports innovation, employee empowerment and autonomy, and non-authoritarian leadership.

Pierce and Newstrom (2000) have described team or group decision making as part of an overall strategy of participative leadership in which the authoritarian mode of decision making is replaced with a more egalitarian set of strategies to achieve consensus. As companies move from an authoritarian supervisory and hierarchical framework to a new emphasis on small groups, work teams, and employee empowerment, more and more d

Read the full essay by joining our writing community – over 32,000 professional essays and term papers. Access this essay now!

Category: Business - A

Some common topics found in the essays are:

Sager Gastil, Discussion Kleindorfer, Kuhn Poole, Conclusions Sales, Introduction Self-managing, Pierce Newstrom, Irwin/McGraw Hill, Similarly Wageman, Resource Planning, Applied Psychology, vroom 2000, team decision, pierce newstrom, hinsz 1995, lewis 1997, sager gastil, sales 2000, gastil 1999, sager gastil 1999, dawson 1993, process boston irwin/mcgraw, leaders leadership, boston irwin/mcgraw hill, kuhn poole 2000, leaders leadership process,

Click Here to Get Instant Access to over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!