Hume and God
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine David Hume's treatment of the design argument for the existence of God, contained in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. The plan of the research will be to set forth the essential steps of the argument made by Cleanthes, who in the Dialogues is advocating the design argument, and then to discuss various refutations of the argument made by Philo, with a view toward suggesting which line of argument seems stronger, whether within Hume's text or from the point of view of outside critique of that text.The argument from design for the existence of God that Cleanthes makes derives from the rational human experience of the found universe. The steps of the argument may be summarized: 1. The created/found universe demonstrates order and an "curious adapting [elsewhere adjustment] of means to ends, throughout all nature, resembl[ing] exactly, though it much exceeds, the productions of human contrivance [i.e., machines, human constructions]" (Hume 53). 2. This well-adjusted universe is perforce the result of either randomness or design, i.e., "from some accidental whistling of the winds . . . [or] from any divine reason or intelligence" (Hume 64). 3. The universe functions either rationally (in an orderly manner) or irrationally (randomly): "Assert either that a rational volume is no proof is no proof of a rational cause, or admit of a similar cause to all the works of nature" (Hume 65). 4. The universe manifests orderly, not random,
. . .
reason. Philo denies the validity of the more general analogy between the adaptation of means to ends by human contrivance (machines) and by the divinely created universe. "Surely you will not affirm, that the universe bears such a resemblance to a house, that we can with the same certainty infer a similar cause, or that the analogy is here entire and perfect. The dissimilitude is so striking, that the utmost you can here pretend to is a guess . . . concerning a similar cause" (Hume 55). In other words, Cleanthes's first premise does not rise to the level of the basis for a proof but is at most the basis for a guess, presumption, conjecture. If such an analogy is the best Cleanthes can do, then Philo remains unconvinced.
Philo says that the orderliness of brass, stone, and so on, do not point to divine but rather human intervention in the universe. Further, the orderliness of complex systems, such as ships and other beautiful machines are the result of many different human intelligences on one hand and on the other the result of trial and error, "a slow, but continued improvement carried on during infinite ages in the art of world-making" (Hume 77). Meanwhile, whatever orderliness is in the universe is by no means perfectly under
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Questions God, God Cleanthes, Cleanthes Philo, God Philo, Meanwhile Hume, Indeed Cleanthes, Hume Philo, Cleanthes Dialogues, Natural Religion, David Hume's, human reason, existence god, human experience, argument design, hume 65, rational intelligence, natural religion, design hume, creative principle, principle universe, concerning natural religion, dialogues concerning natural, universe manifests orderly, similar effects similar, limits human reason,
Approximate Word count = 2519
Approximate Pages = 10 (250 words per page)
|