THE CONGRESSIONAL VOTE FOR WAR WITH IRAQ

The essay outlined here will evaluate the policy and political factors that went into the Resolution to Authorize the use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq - in everyday language, the Iraq war vote. The essay will seek to answer three basic questions about this resolution. These are: What policy objectives were the Iraq war resolution intended to support; what political instruments did the Bush Administration employ in its effort to move the measure through Congress, and did the resolution satisfy the desired objectives?

I. Why a Resolution Vote? Administration Objectives:

The administration did not positively need a Congressional resolution in order to go to war, as many earlier military actions have shown. However, a resolution was desireable as a political legitimizing instrument, to identify the war as a national objective rather than only an administration objective. In fact, two distinct types of legitimacy were sought, domestic and diplomatic.

A. Domestic Legitimacy. During the summer of 2002, as the prospect of military action against Iraq emerged as an issue of public debate, it was by no means broadly popular with the American public. Congressional staffers confirmed what polling data at the time indicated, that sentiment against the war was more vigorous than sentiment in its favor. In this environment, a Congressional resolution would go a long way toward putt

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Domestic Legitimacy, Wavering Republicans, Administration Objectives, Forces Iraq, Bush Administration, Policy Establishing, Valerie Plame, Effects Consequences, WMD Events, Capitol Hill, iraq war, military action, congressional resolution, action iraq, research service library, library congress, congressional research, service library, research service, war resolution, objectives resolution, congressional research service, service library congress,
Approximate Word count = 826
Approximate Pages = 3 (250 words per page)