Public sector Management Reform
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Public sector management reform faces a fundamental question. On one hand, change will not take place unless ideas for improvement are reduced to recipes. On the other hand, such recipes are not reliable guides to effective action across the broad range of settings within the core public sector. This research addresses the issues of whether recipe ideas in public management are overgeneralized rules of thumb, and what steps could mitigate this problem. Before discussing the literature on learning and change in management, some of the key concepts should first be defined. A "recipe idea" is a set of ideas shared by managers. As a result of a variety of factors which influence the transmission of information, managers adopt a way of looking at their situations that is widely shared within their industry. A "rule" is a principal which guides behavior. Meanwhile a "rule of thumb" does not provide for an exact way of doing something and allows for exceptions and the possibility of learning through experience. "Overgeneralized rules," on the other hand, are those rules which do not allow for exceptions or learning and are incorrectly applied to all situations. Consequently, overgeneralized rules oftentimes will not produce the desired outcome (Spender, 1989, pp. 195-197; Schauer, 1991, pp. 17-20). In fact, as industry recipes for success transform into overgeneralized rules of thumb, they become instrumental in undermining innovation and change, and eventually lead to stagnatio
. . .
bureaucracy the locus of control is goal-oriented and exercised by superiors over subordinates acting within defined rules, rather than over the individuals as social actors.
The formal mechanistic model of management emphasizes structure and tells us little about the dynamics of organizational change. In theory a wholly bureaucratized system is wholly controlled and can be changed instantly by promulgating a new rule, just as we might alter a computer program. But experience tells us that organizational practice is hedged about with institutional paraphernalia that reveal the presence of a community of practice, particularly industry recipes, and that this is slow to form and difficult to change. So long as we take the conventional view of these institutions as mere structures and functions, we fail to recognize the momentum of collective practice and are driven to adopt a simple model of innovation. Given the belief that top management is the controller of the organization's institutional fabric and of its adaptation to the institutions making up the firm's environment, we are driven to see changing top management as the crucial step in organizational change and renewal (Moore, 1995, p. 17).
But the research evidence does n
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Institutional Structure, Argyris Schon, Mayes McKiernan, , System Management, United Kingdom, Workshops Strategic, Corporation Citadel, Trade Industry, Learning Organizational, organizational learning, top management, industry recipes, venture development, corporate venture development, corporate venture, knowledge acquisition, management organization, interdepartmental interactions, system management, knowledge development, knowledge acquisition mode, loosely-coupled system management, organizational learning corporate, argyris schon 1996,
Approximate Word count = 3348
Approximate Pages = 13 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Public sector Management Reform
|