The U.S. Political System
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This paper discusses two specific issues relating to the United States political system. The first question relates to whether the United States is a representative democracy, a pluralist democracy, a hyperpluralist system, or in a state of anarchy. What is it about the political parties, the mass public, the mass media, special interest groups, the Congress, the bureaucracy, the domestic presidency, and the foreign affairs presidency that contributes to the creation and maintenance of such a system. The second question raises the issue of whether the United States' system of power is a just or unjust system, with a discussion of the definition of just versus unjust. Democracy is a complicated and ancient concept. The idea of people participating equally in self-rule antedates recorded human history and may be as old as human society itself (Lewellen, 1983, pp. 18-29). The idea of democratic representation offered the mechanism to solve the dilemma of organizing democratic government over a large territory. The American and French revolutionaries intended to make democracy work through popularly elected assemblies: state legislatures in the United States and the National Assembly in France. The introduction of the concept of democratic representation in practice and theory opened the way for the modern conception of democracy (Cooke, 1967, pp. 56-65). Along with the idea of representation, political ideas in the philosophy called liberalism were influential in th
. . .
about politics, which leaves the day-to-day operations of the government in the hands of a political elite: party leaders, officeholders, "notables", and the media. Moreover, some citizens seem to have more interest in politics and greater resources for contact with political leaders. This is described by the Pluralists as the model of competitive elections. To the Pluralists, elections provide an opportunity for even apathetic and passive citizens to choose their political leaders. Since Pluralists assume that the political elite will make actual policy decisions, the role of democratic citizens lies primarily and almost exclusively in their capacity to choose among alternative political leaders. As Joseph Schumpeter put it in a famous definition of democracy: The democratic method is that institutional arrangement for arriving at political decisions in which individuals acquire the power to decide by means of a competitive struggle for the people's vote (Schumpeter, 1950, p. 269).
The Pluralists assume political apathy to be a natural inclination of most people. Unless political affairs directly affect people's immediate interest, most prefer to focus on their private concerns. This theory led political activists and p
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Internet Media, Protective Democracy, Supreme Court, Assembly France, Participatory Democracy, United States', Joseph Schumpeter, , Constitutional Convention, Originally Founders, political leaders, mass media, public officials, developmental model, human nature, popular control government, hudson 1996, separation powers, power unjust, model democracy assumes, democratic representation, system power unjust, system power, united states' system, states' system power,
Approximate Word count = 1855
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on The U.S. Political System
|