The movie Philadelphia
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The movie Philadelphia was something of a surprise hit when it opened in December 1993, since it broke many of the "rules" for commercial success. The subject matter was considered a "downer," being about a man dying of AIDS, a subject that had failed at the box-office before. The film took an appealing and well-liked leading man--Tom Hanks--and showed him deteriorating form the ravages of the disease. The film was also serious in a season usually geared more to Christmas comedies, thrillers, and science fiction. Yet, there were also elements in the mix of the film that are often appealing to the audience, such as the portrayal of an underdog fighting back at the system and winning. The film gives a clear indication of whom the audience is to root for, though this is tempered always with the reality that the main character will die. The case presented is based on discriminatory actions toward homosexuals, fear of AIDs and of people with HIV or AIDs, and the law of wrongful termination. Critic John Simon, who did not like Philadelphia very much, comments on the way the film sanitizes homosexuality and hints at that way of life more than showing it: The film avoids any closer examination of homosexuality, or even AIDS, and hurries to become a courtroom drama, which everyone can have good, wholesome fun with (Simon 68). The film was criticized by many in the homosexual community because it was seen as too distant and too removed from real homosexual life:
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Andrew Miller, Simon Philadelphia, , Supreme Court's, Andrew Beckett, Joe Miller, Review February, law firm, HIV AIDs, Republic February, illegal reason, Judicial Court, fired illegal reason, reason termination, wrongful termination, straight families, fired illegal, philadelphia law, film appealing, sullivan 42, race age sex, philadelphia law firm, race age,
Approximate Word count = 1064
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)
|