Johnson and Johnson and Tylenol
This is an excerpt from the paper...
In 1982, the Johnson and Johnson Corporation suffered a major blow when one of their top selling products, Tylenol, was laced with cyanide while on store shelves and resulted in seven deaths in the Chicago area. The company responded immediately to the problem and launched a highly successful public relations campaign which averted any long-lasting damage to the company's image. On the other hand, after the Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska, Exxon responded so poorly and so slowly that the company still has not recovered its public image. This paper will look at the two disasters, how each company responded, and suggest a public relations strategy which will work for any major corporation placed in this situation. In March of 1989, the Exxon Valdez, an oil tanker, ran aground on Bligh Reef, dumping 11 million gallons of crude oil into Prince William Sound, Alaska, resulting in the worst oil spill in United States history (Rogers, 519). The incident happened seven weeks before its annual shareholders' meeting, turning the meeting into a major media event. The consensus among public relations experts is that nearly every decision the company made in response the event was wrong (Yagoda 48-51). The Exxon Valdez incident is now held up to public relations students as the prime example of what not to do when such a disaster occurs. An NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll taken in April that year showed that 77 percent of the public thought Exxon could have done more to c
. . .
d to the public, and by 1982, it had an astounding 36 percent share of the analgesic market. Tylenol contributed an estimated 7% of Johnson and Johnson's worldwide sales and 15 percent to 20 percent of its profits in 1981. Before the poisonings occurred, executives were confident that Tylenol would take over 50 percent of the market by 1986.
Johnson and Johnson's stock had risen from the low 20s to
46 and 1/8 the night before the poisonings. Within a few days of the tragedy, it dropped seven points and then stabilized in the low 40s (Moore, 45). The sales of Tylenol products initially dropped 80 percent (Moore, 48).
Tylenol's rise in the analgesic market was one of the headiest success stories in ten years, because acetaminophen, Tylenol's only active ingredient, is a compound any drug company can make. In 1982, with the damage to its name and 35 percent to 40 percent of the total Tylenol line removed from retailers' shelves, Johnson and Johnson executives had to work quickly to achieve the Tylenol comeback (Moore, 45).
Another challenge Johnson and Johnson had to face after the Tylenol poisonings was increased competition in the aspirin-free analgesic market. Dun's Business Month (26) reported that, within a few we
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Johnson Johnson, Johnson Johnson's, Drug Administration, Business Communicators, America Alaska, Business Week, Consumer Product, World Report, Despite Tylenol, Public Radio, johnson johnson, public relations, tylenol capsules, mcneil consumer, yagoda 48-51, business week, koepp 59, monroe prout hager, beck monroe, consumer products, johnson johnson's, food drug administration, beck monroe prout, mcneil consumer products, subsidiary mcneil consumer,
Approximate Word count = 5479
Approximate Pages = 22 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Johnson and Johnson and Tylenol
|