Models of Personality and Abnormal Behavior
The purpose of this paper is to re
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this paper is to review two models of personality and abnormal behavior: (1) the cognitive model of Albert Ellis (Ellis, 1979, 1989), and (2) the phenomenological model of Carl Rogers (Rogers, 1961, 1972, 1977). Each models is discussed in terms of its position regarding normal personalty development or normal mental health, and its position regarding the development of psychopathology. This discussion of normal and abnormal processes is followed by a section in which similarities and differences between the two models are delineated. The final section of the paper presents a commentary in which the strengths and weaknesses of each model are addressed. Like most cognitive theorists, Ellis (1979, 1989) states that all human behavior is based on the way an individual perceives, anticipates, or evaluates events. In other words, how individuals judge their circumstances or situations (and not the actual circumstances/situations) is what most profoundly affects their emotional reactions and behavior. How an individual interprets events, according to Ellis, is a function of his or her "schema," which is defined as an individual's underlying assumptions about life, the world, other people, oneself, etc. These assumptions are said to influence the person's experiences, values, and perceived capabilities. The person with a normal or healthy mentality has a schema that is esse
. . .
althy personality is one whose childhood experiences left him or her relatively free of or unencumbered by societal restrictions. As a result, these people have developed a self-concept that is consistent with their self-actualizing tendency.
Rogers stated that fully functioning people have been "allowed to grow" toward their potential. And the environment said to be most suitable for this growth is not conditional but unconditional positive regard.
The Development of Psychopathology
Psychopathology, according to Rogers (1951), arises from societal standards for self-worth, standards transmitted through "conditional positive regard." defined as others' provisional acceptance of an individual. This, in turn, causes the individual to see him- or herself as having worth only when others approve---a self-concept that is inconsistent or incongruent with the self-actualizing tendency.
Thus, psychological problems are the result of this state of incongruence. The developing child who attempts to become what others wish is at odds with his/her own desires or potential and this conflict forms the basis of abnormal behavior.
Similarities and Differences
Both of the reviewed theories root psychopathology in the formative exper
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Similarities Differences, Model Ellis', Personality/Mental Health, According Ellis, Model Rogers', Health Rogers', Psychopathology Psychopathology, Rogers Rogers, Rogers CR, Third Ellis', phenomenological model, ellis 1979, self-actualizing tendency, rogers cr, cognitive model, ellis 1979 1989, 1979 1989, rogers' phenomenological, ellis' cognitive, rogers' model, development psychopathology, ellis' cognitive model, rogers' phenomenological model, unconditional positive regard, model normal personality/mental,
Approximate Word count = 1354
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Models of Personality and Abnormal Behavior
The purpose of this paper is to re
|