Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

RON SHEEN'S "AN EGTM: WHAT IS IT?" (1993) A Cri

This is an excerpt from the paper...

RON SHEEN'S "AN EGTM: WHAT IS IT?" (1993)

Yakudoku vs Communicative Methodology

Sheen (1993) challenges the current trend to communicative methodology in the teaching of English to Japanese students. Although he deplores the domination of yakudoku (Hino, 1988), viz. the excessive Japanese version of the traditional grammar translation method, he argues that an Enlightened Grammar Translation Method (EGTM) "offers a viable means for Japanese schools to reconcile the need to meet the requirements of an extremely formal examination system and the demands of Mombusho for change in the form of a more oral orientation" (p. 13).

He states that "An underlying premise of contemporary communicative methodology is based on an important degree of equivalence between first and foreign language acquisition" (p. 13). One need clarify Sheen's statement. Indeed, whatever one's methodological orientation, it would be inane to discount the first language's corpus of linguistic acquisitions and its influence on the acquisition of a second language. Learning strategies have been devised and honed in the process of L1 acquisition. These strategies are idiosyncratic: they constitute the individual's learning style. To this degree, there is a certain equivalence between L1 and L2 acquisition that even grammar-translation advocates cannot deny.

To develop one's individual learning style, one must identify (at whatever level of consciousness) one's avenues of most effective or lea

. . .
ative methodology points to the failure of the contrastive analysis approach, because, among several factors, structural similarities and dissimilarities between two linguistic systems and the processing of linguistic means in actual production and comprehension are two different processes altogether. Contrastive analysis is concerned with differences between and among languages--an academic topic of peripheral interest to advanced L2 learners; acquisition is concerned with comprehension and production. The contemporary problem facing Japanese education (as opposed to instruction) may indeed be whether the aim of schooling is the acquisition of functional comprehension and production of a foreign language (a current economic, political, scientific, and cultural necessity), or the learning of linguistic paradigms and contrastive analysis techniques (an exercise in futility for all but future philologists concerned with historical and comparative linguistics). Sheen also points to the "necessity for instruction in FFLL compared to its redundancy in the learning of an L1" (p. 13). No teacher of language will dismiss the need for instruction in L2 learning. Likewise, however, no teacher will deny that instruction is paramount to L1
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Method EGTM, Jackson Sheen, English Communicative, Syntactically Japanese, English Japanese, American Australian, L1 L2, English McLuhan's, Japanese English, Inasmuch L1, communicative methodology, japanese students, foreign language, l2 learning, translation method, native english, english japanese, direct indirect objects, methodology based, learning strategies, degree equivalence, meaning structures words, translation method egtm, communicative methodology based, japanese students english,
Approximate Word count = 2846
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW