Infidelity in Men and Women
This paper look at attitudes to infidel
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This paper look at attitudes to infidelity in men and women. It begins with a review of the literature on the subject, and then present a study in which males and females, either dating or married, were asked whether or not they approved of infidelity in their relationship. The results were analyzed by ANOVA and it was found that there was a significant difference between the attitude of males and females, males being more accepting of infidelity than females. The differences were statistically significant, and were the same whether the individuals were dating or married. Almost all Americans disapprove of infidelity, with as many as 90 percent of them saying that it is always or almost always wrong for married people to have sex with someone besides their spouse, according to one report (Treas and Giesen, 2000). Almost half the states in the U. S. Still have laws on their books against adultery that would deny married people who commit adultery the right to vote, serve alcohol, practice law, adopt children, or raise their own children. Factors making Americans more likely to engage in extramarital sex include being male, being African American, and being better educated (49). Reports indicated that only between 1.5 percent and 3.6 percent of married persons had a secondary sex partner in the last year. Facilitating factors include circumstances assuring secrecy and the availability of sexual partners (Treas and Giesen, 2000). Dissatisfac
. . .
that more women than men were distressed by a partnerĘs emotional infidelity than by their sexual infidelity (342). Similar results were found across racial lines. These results were predicted by the researchers. This adds to the growing body of evidence that men and women react differently to infidelity in their partner. More men were distressed by a threat to a partnerĘs attractiveness, whereas more women were distressed by a threat to a partnerĘs economic security and by the partnerĘs commitment, as attested to by willingness to sign a prenuptial agreement.
Buunk, Angleitner, Oubaid and Buss (1996) also compared sex differences in jealousy in evolutionary and cultural perspective.
They conducted parallel studies in the Netherlands, Germany, and the United States to look at sexual differences in respect to responses to infidelity. The prediction was that men would take a serious view of sexual infidelity of their mate because from an evolutionary standpoint, their paternal certainty was compromised and they would lose expended mating energy (160). For women, the child is her own regardless of who is the father, but infidelity of her partner emotionally would threaten her economic survival.
Results showed that in th
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Treas Giesen, Chernozhukov Hong, African American, Ebony Unlike, Drigotas Barta, Nell Buckmaster, Cann Mangum, St Petersburg, Dilemmas Questionnaire, American White, african american, sexual infidelity, males females, dating married, percent married, extramarital affairs, treas giesen 2000, women distressed, giesen 2000, st petersburg, treas giesen, estonia st petersburg, buunk angleitner oubaid, distressed threat partnerĘs, 36 percent married,
Approximate Word count = 3110
Approximate Pages = 12 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Infidelity in Men and Women
This paper look at attitudes to infidel
|