Capital Punishment and the Talmud
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This paper will provide an analysis of ten Talmudic passages dealing with the issue of capital punishment, in order to demonstrate how the rabbis of the first two centuries C.E. ôbuilt a fence around the Lawö (the famous third precept stated in Pirke Avoth) in order to adapt the Draconian prescriptions inherited from a far more primitive era to the conditions and society of their own time. Most of the passages will be drawn from Sanhedrin, with a few contrasting ones drawn from other tractates.The starting point for this line of thought could be almost any one of the Torah passages that prescribe the death penalty for some infraction against people or God. It is well-known that Torah, especially Leviticus, has many such ôeye-for-an-eyeö prescriptions, and these are still often thrown in the teeth of Jews as showing that Judaism is ôanti-humanö or some similar bigoted bilge. The irony is, of course, that the Rabbis who were the founders of what became mainstream Judaism were perfectly well aware how anachronistic such laws were, and even of how anachronistic the Temple sacrifices themselves were, by the time of the Roman occupation, and their major concern was how to reinterpret these and other laws in a way that did not negate them, but adapted them to a more ômodernö era. The effort to continue such interpretation is, of course, on-going. Judaism could probably not survive without such continual growth and adaptation to an ever-changing world.
. . .
f any of these (382).
The Gemara surrounding this passage deal with the issue of whether the death penalty is enjoined for violation of all of these mitzvoth. Earlier in Sanhedrin 56a the following is said:
Our Rabbis taught [concerning ôAny man that curseth his God, shall bear his sin;ö Lev. 24:15], What is taught by the expression ôAny manö? The inclusion of heathens, to whom blasphemy is prohibited just as to Israelites; and they are executed by decapitation; for every death penalty decreed for the sons of Noah is only by decapitation.
On this Schachter makes the following annotation:
The only place where death is explicitly decreed for non-Israelites is in Gen. IX,6: Whoso sheddeth manÆs blood, by man shall his blood be shed. It is a general law, applicable to all, having been given in the pre-Abrahamic era; his blood shall be shed must refer to the sword, the only [legal form of] death whereby blood is shed (380).
However, the Gemara then continues with a technical discussion of exactly what constitutes blasphemy in this context. Quoting the same verse from Leviticus (24:15), it asks, ôWhy is this written? Has it not already been stated, `And he that blasphemeth the name of the Lord, he shall surely be put to deathÆ?
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Antiochus Epiphanes, Obviously Gentile, Judaism Christianity, Mishnah Sanhedrin, Israel Sanhedrin, Jews Judaism, Red Sea, Nachman Isaac, Hence Gemara, IX6 Whoso, death penalty, noachic mitzvoth, blood shed, human life, save human life, save human, manÆs blood blood, commit murder, idolatry incest, rabbis taught, reaches conclusion, sanhedrin 56a, transgress mitzvoth save, sheddeth manÆs blood,
Approximate Word count = 2667
Approximate Pages = 11 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Capital Punishment and the Talmud
|