Banking Regulation and the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The world of business has changed dramatically in recent years, yet one sectorùbankingùremained shackled by age-old regulations. That is what the framers of the Glass-Steagall Act intended. The law, passed in 1933, placed strict limits on banks to prevent a repeat of the Great Depression. In recent years, however, Glass-Steagall has come under attack, with banks, politicians, and even regulators calling on Congress to reform federal regulation of financial institutions. This paper will examine the politics of bank reform, and how a concerted and expensive lobbying effort finally paid off in 1999.The Glass-Steagall Act, which Congress passed in 1933, sought to cure the excesses that spurred the Great Depression. The legislation also sought to restore the nation's faith in banks. During the 1920s, banks served as underwriters on securities, and many lost millions in speculative ventures. Banks extended themselves into so many areas that they could not weather the economic downturn. As Americans hoarded money, banks simply ran out of capital, prompting numerous ôrunsö and bank failures. That lack of liquidity helped turn a recession into the Great Depression (Campagna, 1987, pp. 101-113). To restore confidence, Glass-Steagall established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which guarantees deposits in insured banks. To prevent banks from becoming overextended and illiquid, Glass-Steagall divorced investment banking from commercial banking, and gave the Federal
. . .
s [had] eroded the legal walls that bar[red] banks, securities firms and insurance companies from elbowing into each other's businessesö (Brownstein, 1997, p. A5). The initial effort fell short and House leaders pulled the bill from the floor in the spring of 1997. A caution sign put up by Alan Greenspan, the well-respected Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board, helped put a damper on the effort (ôGreenspan backs two-stage reform of U.S. banking laws,ö 1999, p. C4).
For businesses, however, repeal of Glass-Steagall became only a matter of time. Travelers (insurance) and Citicorp (banking) merged in 1997, expressing confidence that Congress would soon pass legislation permitting their union. Lobbyists redoubled their efforts, especially those from the merged Travelers and Citicorp, who needed a reform bill passed before their five-year waiver from the Federal Reserve expired (ôFirms betting on change of federal laws,ö 1997, p. D12).
The Clinton Administration's economic team, led by Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, supported the repeal of Glass-Steagall in principle. Buoyed by the ever-expanding economy, a consensus had emerged that a repeat of the 1920s could be avoided because of strict oversight by federal regulators. De
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Federal Reserve, Research PIRG, President Clinton, Reserve Board, A8 Clinton, Act Congress, Glass-Steagall Act, Robert Rubin, Finally Clinton, Financial Services, bank reform, angeles times, los angeles times, los angeles, february 11, reform bill, federal reserve, 1999 february, 1999 february 11, financial services, 1999 october 23, committee banking financial, 1999 october, october 23, banking financial services,
Approximate Word count = 1888
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Banking Regulation and the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933
|