Water Policy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
In Harrison C. DunningÆs (p. 26) ôDam Fights and Water Policy in California: 1969-1989,ö the author provides an account of the two decades of battles between the ôdam fightersö and ôdam backersö who have wrought changes in CaliforniaÆs public water policy. In previous eras, dam backers typically won these battles and unrestrained development flourished in light of public water policies geared toward providing irrigation, power, and city water supply. However, during this two decade period, Dunning (p. 26) contends that though they lost some key battles the dam fighters are ahead and have been responsible for changes in public water policy to the degree that ôwise management is replacing unrestrained developmentö as the dominant aim of water policy in California.California water policy, like the water policy of any state, is designed to regulate limited resources so that they are used according to the preference of policymakers. Different interest groups often back different policies and it is no different of a factionalist dynamic that guides the ôdam fightsö which Dunning (p. 14) maintains ôhighlight the underlying clash in values regarding the best use of water.ö Dam backers often perceive dams with pride, as an example of manÆs control of and taming nature for his own benefit. Dam fighters often view dams as intrusive, economically-driven structures that promote the destruction of riparian vegetation, wildlife, and natural flowing stre
. . .
at such concepts as stream protection, national park inclusion, water marketing, and wise management.
The highly public controversies between these two camps of thought on water policy is a symbol of factionalism in U.S. policymaking that helps promote democracy because of different groups vying for control of limited resources.
The ultimate outcome of the dam fight battles between dam backers and dam fighters is that the more powerful efforts of the dam fighters have shifted water policy to the point where wise management is replacing unrestrained development as CaliforniaÆs dominant water policy.
ESSAY TWO
Introduction
The San Gabriel River Watershed Act authorizes the National Park Service to prepare a study on the feasibility of including the river and its tributaries in the national park system. Dunning (p. 26) maintains that over the past three decades ôWise management is replacing unrestrained development as CaliforniaÆs dominant water policy.ö The intention of this research is to advocate for inclusion of the San Gabriel River Watershed and its tributaries in the national park system by providing the National Park Service (NPS) with an explanation of the significance of various historical, cultural, scientific, and
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Park Dam, California California, San Gabriel, River Watershed, Viewed Apr, Policy California, James Madison, Congresswoman Solis, san gabriel, Management Policies, Gabriel River, water policy, gabriel river, san gabriel river, gabriel river watershed, river watershed, dam fighters, dam backers, apr 14, national park, viewed apr 14, viewed apr, 14 2005, apr 14 2005, water policy california,
Approximate Word count = 2349
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Water Policy
|