Police, Civil Liability, and the Law

A. Police accountability to the public has increased over the past four decades due to notorious examples of policing abuse, such as the Rodney King case.

B. Lawsuits filed against police are on the rise and threaten both individual officers and police agencies.

C. The purpose of this chapter is to outline state and federal law that applies to officer liability. This discussion also includes the risk of liability for police agencies and police supervisors related to the actions of their officers.

A. A variety of trots exist under state law, with respect to police liability.

1. A tort equals a ôcivil wrongö (Del Carmen and Smith, 1996, 181)

2. Alleged victims of police abuse typically charge officers with ôbreach of dutyö and sue for ôcompensatoryö (monetary) damages and/or punitive damages to ôpunishö officer wrongdoing (Del Carmen et al. 1996, 181).

1. Assault occurs when an officer intentionally and without ôlegal justificationö places a suspect in fear of bodily harm (Del Carmen et al. 1996, 182).

2. Battery occurs when ôintentionalö or ôunlawfulö touching of one person by another happens without legal justification (Del Carmen et al. 1996, 182).

1. False arrest and false imprisonment occur when an officer arrests a suspect without a ôsufficient legal basisö (Del Carmen et al. 1996, 182).

2. False imprisonment is ôrestricti

. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Del Carmen, Negligence Liability, Rights Act, Conclusion Civil, Liability Civil, Wrongful Death, Liability Subordinates, King Lawsuits, Individual Capacity, Carmen Smith, del carmen, et al, carmen et, del carmen et, carmen et al, et al 1996, section 1983, al 1996, 1996 182, al 1996 182, law enforcement, liability law, supervisor liability, federal law, et al 1986,
Approximate Word count = 894
Approximate Pages = 4 (250 words per page)