Dietrich Bonhoeffer's Ethics
This is an excerpt from the paper...
In Dietrich BonhoefferÆs (1955) Ethics, we are privy to the authorÆs depiction of Nazi Germany. In the book, Bonhoeffer provides a philosophical discussion of the relationship between the individualÆs duty to self and the state. For his resistance to Nazism, Bonhoeffer was imprisoned and lost his life, unable to finish Ethics completely. However, his discussion of ethics focuses on the complex issue for the individual for determining when he or she has a higher duty to follow GodÆs law than state law. This knowledge of when to obey God over all is the only way to connect with others, ôIt is only in the unity of his knowledge of God that he knows of other men, of things, and of himselfö (Bonhoeffer, 1955, p. 21). Despite the complexity of the issue, Bonhoeffer contends that he was acting out of faithfulness to God in his resistance to Nazism more than those who obeyed the corrupt state. One of BonhoefferÆs main contentions is that his resistance to Nazi authority exhibits much greater moral clarity than the actions of Germans who worshipped and obeyed the state without question. Bonhoeffer contends that LutherÆs doctrine of two kingdoms helps explain the blind obedience to the state exhibited by many Germans. For Luther argued that the state and its rules are required to help undermine manÆs capacity for evil. Luther encouraged believers to faithfully obey the state and its rules unless they were forced to deny their faith. As such, Bonhoeffe
. . .
ces, Cone shares a number of black spirituals and other documents that help illustrate black theology understands being one with Christ is fighting for liberation of all, particularly the poor and downtrodden. The black experience has been such that the true nature of brotherhood emerges from the unity and necessity of finding a way out from under oppression that is not true in Christ: ôWe are black, and that fact alone ought to keep us open to each other, not for the purpose of conversion, but for shared participation in finding out the best means of struggle. This openness is the crux of our authentic recognition of each other as brothers and sistersö (Cone, 1997, p. 198).
White theology all too often stems from self-interested ideology that fails to not only liberate but to reconcile. The innocent suffering of blacks is what led to the Divine revelation of Christ as liberator, not subjective interest. Black theology is able to see Christ in a transcendent manner that rises above the subjective interest of other theologies and understands liberation as the means to freedom and reconciliation. Because other, particularly white, theologies have distorted thought through ideology, Cone (1997) argues that blacks must look to
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Frank Parsons, Berger Luckmann, Christ Countryman, God Beginning, Nazi Germany, Christ God, Christö Bonhoeffer, Christians Likewise, God Countryman, Jesus Christ, feminist ethics, countryman 1988, christian ethics, black theology, cone 1997, sexual morality, feminist ethic, bonhoeffer 1955, sexuality bible, white theology, sexual morality ethics, feminism christian ethics, feminist ethics christian, true meaning biblical, countryman 1988 argues,
Approximate Word count = 4908
Approximate Pages = 20 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Dietrich Bonhoeffer Ethics
|