Physician Assisted Suicide Controversy
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Physician-assisted suicide remains a highly controversial issue. While some view it as a moral issue that goes against medical ethics and religious beliefs, others view it as an individual right and more about money than morals. As one critic of recent government intervention in OregonÆs Death with Dignity Act, granting an individual the right to physician-assisted termination of life, notes: ôMore money and therefore more profit for the drug companies can be made by keeping a person alive longer. This is not a moral issue for President Bush and the gang, itÆs a money issueö (Davis 2001, B10). Attorney General John Ashcroft is one of the ôgangö trying to reverse the Oregon law permitting assisted suicide. This analysis will address physician-assisted suicide, explaining why the issue needs to be resolved through public policy that allows terminally ill individuals the right to die. Assisted suicide is a concept growing in popularity among many segments of the American population. Terminally ill patients are seeking the right to end their lives with dignity, without pain, and before all of their resources are drained from care that will not improve their quality of life. Dr. Jack Kevorkian is perhaps the nationÆs biggest advocate of assisted-suicide, being charged with first-degree murder after euthanizing Thomas Youk, a victim of Lou GehrigÆs disease, a euthanizing that was aired on 60 Minutes (Sullivan 1998, 003). People
. . .
pting over whether states or the federal government should have authority over such legislation. One factor that gives the US government more power than the states on this issue is law governing drug administration, ôFederal law trumps state law in the administration of drugs under the Controlled Substances Act, which governs powerful prescription drugs like morphine that alleviate pain, but which can killö (Fields 2001, A19). President Bush and his father have long opposed physician assisted suicide. However, before passing the law in Oregon, Oregonian officials solicited the support of former Attorney General Janet Reno who promised she would not prosecute if the law passed. Attorney Ashcroft has made no such promises.
One irony of the Oregon law is that the Washington State Medical Association and the Oregon Medical Association have joined forces to oppose AshcroftÆs ruling in regard to the law. Physicians are worried that AshcroftÆs ruling will expose then to unwarranted investigations if they prescribe aggressive pain medication. Further, physicians say the law allows them to provide better care to patients. As one physician notes, ôA lot of the criticism that it would be overused or lead to widespread euthanasia has
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Ed OÆConnor, Hoover Barnett, Lou GehrigÆs, ThereÆs American, Dignity Act, John Ashcroft, Medical Association, A21 Ashcroft, Buckley Jr, Act Individuals, assisted suicide, terminally ill, dignity act, death dignity act, death dignity, oregon law, hoover barnett, terminally ill patients, physician-assisted suicide, ill patients, sullivan 1998 003, ashcroftÆs ruling, public policy, barnett 2001 e01, hoover barnett 2001,
Approximate Word count = 1502
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Physician Assisted Suicide Controversy
|