Essays on Sex
This is an excerpt from the paper...
In PrimoratzÆ (YEAR) ôSex As Language,ö the author critiques Robert SolomonÆs view that sex is language, ôàbodily equivalent of a sentence,ö (p. 37). Primoratz maintains SolomonÆs view of sex as language is closer to the hedonistic view of sex rather than the procreation or love views. Even so, Primoratz critiques SolomonÆs theory on sex as language both because it is too ônarrowö and too ôinclusive,ö a theory that is also critiqued for the authorÆs presentation of it ôas a complete, exclusive account of sexualityö (Primoratz, YEAR, p. 39-40). This analysis will discuss PrimoratzÆ main points, offer objections for some and explanation for agreement with others. A conclusion will provide a personal opinion about sex.Primoratz (YEAR) makes a number of points in the essay ôSex As Language,ö regarding the theories of Robert Solomon that sex is basically a language: ôàits grammar delineated by the body, the touch and the movement providing the phonetics, the gesture being the unit of meaningfulnessö (p. 37). Solomon argues that sex is a form of body language that represents interpersonal communication that is the primary goal of sex. He argues that sex is a body language in which ôàwe communicate to others our feelings and attitudes about them, and about ourselves tooö (Primoratz, YEAR, p. 36). Love plays no role in sex for it cannot be recognized from other feelings or attitudes being expressed through sexual language. I support SolomonÆs co
. . .
es when engaging in sexual encounters. As to procreation, we both know we have talked about adequate protections and precautions, since you have expressed to me you only want children after marriage.
As you begin to more deeply explore your sexuality, I want you to keep in mind that the patriarchy and social institutions (the media, the church, etc.) run by it has relegated women to an inferior position with respect to sexual activity. Women are often exploited or objectified through such institutions in ways that allow men to dominate sexual relations and in ways that are harmful to women. The entertainment industry routinely ôàpresents violence not only as manly and heroic but as great funö (Eisler, 1995, p. 253). All too often male violence against women, especially sexual aggression, occurs because we live in a society that values such behavior as manly even though it hurts others. Please remember that instead of being dominated in a relationship you are striving to forge a partnership where what is considered obscene is not loving acts of sex with someone whom you share mutual respect but acts that are ôàexploitative, degrading, and hurtful sexö and that violence with sex is not ômanlinessö but ômeannessö (Eisler, 1995,
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Riane Eisler, Dear Sibling, Robert Solomon, Eisler Eisler, Catholic Church, Robert SolomonÆs, Conclusion Personally, eisler 1995, Body Primoratz, Introduction PrimoratzÆ, social institutions, eisler 1995 maintains, 1995 maintains, view sex, sexual activity, sex language, perspective sex, dominator model, solomon argues, partnership-pleasure model, Primoratz Sex, view sex language, dominator model sexuality, current dominator model, shift partnership-pleasure model,
Approximate Word count = 1884
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Essays on Sex
|