Teacher Qualification Standards
This is an excerpt from the paper...
This paper examines the question of whether or not states should be allowed to revise or even eliminate teacher qualification standards in order to enlarge the pool of available talent as a solution to the shortage of certified teachers. Increasingly, schools throughout America are confronted with a shrinking pool of teachers who have received the conventional education that allows them to meet each state=s standards for teaching certificates. Low pay, heightened demands beyond skills at imparting knowledge, reduced public respect for the profession, and a host of other challenges make attracting and keeping trained teachers an increasingly daunting challenge. One of the more intriguing but controversial ideas has been to draw on the expertise and enthusiasm of individuals with a wealth of content knowledge but limited formal training in teaching methodology to fill the gap. While many oppose this as Ade-professionalizing@ the profession, this paper argues that the idea has considerable merit and should be pursued.In contemporary America, a basic, quality education is considered the right of every individual. Education provides literacy and a body of shared abilities and knowledge that are essential to building the skilled workforce and involved citizenry needed to run a capitalist democracy. In such a system, teaching should be considered to be one of the noblest professions. Yet, as public schools have increasingly come under attack for their perceived failure to so
. . .
often formulating lesson plans, designing courses, and carrying out other activities that clearly require teaching skills. Yet, because they have not studied education in any formal kind of way, they cannot be certified through conventional, existing channels, and, therefore, they cannot be hired by school districts desperate for qualified teachers.
Solorzano (1987, July 27) observes, AWithin the teaching guild . . . there is entrenched resistance to the idea. To hire people without adequate training >makes a mockery out of the whole profession and is grossly unfair to the children,=
insists National Education Association President Mary Hatwood Futrell@ (p. 58). Other experts believe that inexperienced, untrained, uncertified teachers require too much work to supervise and come to the job without a real understanding of the complicated art that is classroom teaching. At least one other factor may sometimes be present, Solorzano (1987, July 27) notes: AIn some districts, there is also considerable professional jealousy at play. One superintendent [said] that he didn't want >any IBM executives= in his school@ (p. 60).
However, the shortage remains real, and a number of districts and other educational institutions are experime
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
, Service Corps, Leaf Dec, Anne Lewis, Hatwood Futrell@, Florida Texas, Judith Newman, Steve Forbes, Ezra Bowen, America Solutions, july 27, 1987 july, 1987 july 27, solorzano 1987 july, solorzano 1987, 2000 january, 1997 26, qualified teachers, wulf 1997, teacher education, lewis 2000 january, lewis 2000, wulf 1997 26, newman 1998, forbes 1998 september,
Approximate Word count = 1675
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Teacher Qualification Standards
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
