Story of Captivity in 18th Century Massachusetts
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine issues surrounding the story of captivity of seven-year-old Eunice Williams by Indians in early eighteenth-century Deerfield, Massachusetts, as well as her subsequent decision, first made as an adolescent and repeatedly confirmed as an adult, to remain with the Mohawk Indians at Kahnawake instead of rejoining her biological family. The plan of the research will be to set forth the context in which Eunice's captivity became an issue and then to explore possible reasons that she chose to remain at Kahnawake, with reference to Demos's The Unredeemed Captive and to Axtell's analysis of the not uncommon phenomenon of colonial-era Europeans who made choices similar to that of Eunice Williams.A raid made by Indians on the Puritan settlement of Deerfield, Massachusetts, in 1704 resulted in the deaths of some 50 villagers and the carrying-off of more than 110 men, women, and children on an eight-week forced march to the "popish country" of Catholic Montreal, in midwinter. The most prominent among the captives was the family of the Reverend John Williams, who in his account of his captivity describes being separated during the forced march from his wife and five surviving children, three of whom were ransomed quickly in Montreal; two other children were killed in the initial attack. Within two days, Williams's wife, who was weak and recovering from childbirth, was killed when she fell behind along the trail, but the other children were eith
. . .
erived biblical sanction that informed the British colonial project.
Still, it is difficult to credit Demos's implication that the Indians' murder of women and children at Deerfield and on the subsequent march was an instance of moral neutrality, superior Indian virtue, or European misunderstanding of Native American cultural norms when it was the Indians who initiated the massacre and march. Undoubtedly circumstances and priorities differed from massacre to massacre, and doubtless too, individual personalities clashed in a variety of ways that affected captivity dynamics and outcomes. Nevertheless, Mary Rowlandson's description of the people in Lancaster and on the trail to various encampments who were killed by being "knockt on the head" and disemboweled and of the woman and her infant apparently gleefully tortured and killed after repeatedly begging to be released cannot be reconciled with Axtell's assertion that Indians did not violate captive women and selected captives with a view toward acculturation and "adoption" for the purpose of replacing "members of their own families who had died, often from English musketballs or imported diseases." On the other hand, Demos's explanation of the practicality of quickly killing th
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
John Williams, Mary Rowlandson's, Bay Mohawk, Lord Almighty, Scriptures Demos, Deerfield Montreal, English French, Beyond Axtell, Canaanites Amelekites, According Axtell, john williams, colonial history ed, history ed karen, york dc heath, york dc, kupperman york, ed karen, karen kupperman, dc heath, history ed, ed karen kupperman, english captives, english french, karen kupperman york, major american,
Approximate Word count = 2253
Approximate Pages = 9 (250 words per page)
|