Impact of On-Line Card Catalogs on End Users
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine aspects of manner in which the library science professional community treats the issue of the impact of on-line card catalogs and other machine-readable library utilities on end users, hereafter sometimes referred to as library clients. The plan of the research will be to set forth the context in which the use of high technology by library clients has become relevant in the current period and then to discuss what appears to be an unfortunate gap in the professional community's conceptualization of the relationship between effective utilization of on-line library utilities in general and the use of such technology by clients in particular.The impact of the Information Age on library organization and praxis would have been impossible to manage had a machine-readable version of information not been accessible via compu ter automation. Conventional card cataloging had long been available; however, it is one thing to have information embed ded in manually operated index ing systems and another to have staff available to use such systems efficiently. Computer-as sisted sorting, cross-ref erencing, and indexing of bibliogra phic material, plus the capability of instantaneous retrieval of bibliographic entries so sorted and indexed made the differ ence between existence and usage of the information explosion. Library-specific high technology was uniquely suited to improv ing access to research materials. But along with high-tech po tential
. . .
ioning a key role for reference librarians in the development and implementation of successful searches, particularly regar ding specialized knowledge areas and "nonbibliographic" infor mation. This point is also made by Horny (334).
By 1986, the sheer volume of machine-readable data suitable for library cataloging had created a strongly felt need on the part of library professionals for good retrieval mechanisms. The Library of Congress had established standards for on-line cataloging, and protocols allowed machine-readable cards created by LC to be shared by other libraries on the LC system. But implementation of an on-line card catalogue and other searchable media lagged well behind the creation rate of new library materials, and the hard fact was that most libraries faced a cataloging backlog nightmare.
Throughout the 1980s there was a debate between librarians favoring (1) systematic creation of universal standards meant to facilitate information sharing and consistency between and among important libraries or (2) creation of information-re trieval catalogues in a "brief cataloging" (Ross and West 334) or "minimally defined format" so that potential users would not be faced with "complete absence of information for a given it
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Shera Perry, Somers Kamens, Information Age, Ross West, Library Congress, , Cataloging MLC, Ultimately Svenonius, Academic Librarianship, FC MLC, 11 january, journal academic librarianship, librarianship 11 january, january 1986, 11 january 1986, journal academic, academic librarianship, librarianship 11, academic librarianship 11, shera perry, minimal-level cataloging, von wahlde, library science, library resources technical, technology library,
Approximate Word count = 1437
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
