Aspects of Bias and Prejudice
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The purpose of this research is to examine aspects of bias and prejudice. The plan of the research will be to set forth selected major academic, professional, practitioner, and intellectual biases that have emerged in the psychology discipline in the past and in the current period, and then to connect such prejudices with equivalent attitudes in education and the media. Finally, an outline of research resources that may help diminish bias while fostering critical thinking in the discipline will be suggested, with a view toward demonstrating that remedies are available to combat the negative effects of bias in psychology research, analysis, and practice.Whether progressive or intolerant, individual and group attitudes are a consequence of the interpenetration of several influences: personal-psychological-internal, educational-external-formal, and cultural-external-informal. In their discussion of research and writing methods and strategies, Barzun and Graff deal with how to recognize bias in psychology, academia, and media and how researchers might avoid falling into the traps of bias. The difficulty of this project is suggested by Paul, who cites Scriven's view that "common usage does not discriminate accurately or effectively between having strong and reasonable convictions about something and being biased about it." That is, indiscriminate accusations of bias do not serve serious discourse any more than does bias itself. Bias in psychology arises either unconsciously or
. . .
ight is bound to be partial and limited, which implies an imperative toward self-critique as well as critique of the other. For example, does Kristeva's statement reflect bias toward Freud and against women, or for or against dominant culture? Or is her perspective altogether flawed? Such questions imply Paul's corrective for bias, which is ""discourse and critical exchange with other minds . . . with realism and vigilance."
Academic bias in the past can be identified with traditionalist advocates of the intellectual canon, which is centered on Western philosophy and literature, most of it written by men. Bloom's Closing of the American Mind criticizes intellectual relativism in university education because it results in impoverishment of educational priorities. The notion of democracy of ideas sounds inclusive, but Bloom argues that "democracy of the disciplines" has the effect of limiting learning. Bloom's argument responds to modern challenge to the dominant canon, which is said to be biased toward "revealing fixed eternal truths than . . . active critical argument." A more radical critique, rejecting "hegemony of dead, white, European males" and associated with "atoning for white-skin privilege" has been termed politic
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Congress Similarly, Barzun Graff, Richardson Molinaro, American Mind, , II Print-based, Card Catalogue, Robert Dole, Interviews Clinical, Online University, bias psychology, barzun graff, american mind, social sciences, closing american mind, closing american, dissertation abstracts international, sciences citation, 3 social, political correctness, multicultural competence, social sciences citation, sciences citation index, liberal media,
Approximate Word count = 1374
Approximate Pages = 5 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Aspects of Bias and Prejudice
|