Intellectuals in Public Discourse
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Intellectuals have long had a significant role in public discourse in countries around the world. The reason for this is simple; they are the people with the ideas. In any public venue, someone needs to develop a concept that others can useùprinciples of government, solutions to social problems, or systems of economics. It is generally the intellectuals who do this, primarily because they enjoy working with ideas and are adept at developing concepts. Intellectuals are quite often college-educated, as well, which means that they have been schooled in the study and formulation of ideas. Ideas and concepts are their currency, the realm they feel most comfortable in, and within that realm, they rule. Intellectuals are influential in shaping public opinion, including whole governments, for a couple of reasons. First, they are passionate about what they believe, and passion always has the ring of truth to it; it is convincing. Second, they are good at expressing what they believe and casting it in terms that can render it acceptable to others, repurposing any offensive or unacceptable parts to look like something else and putting their own philosophical spin on it. Intellectuals are the ôspin doctorsö of public thought. This has both positive and negative implications. On the positive side, they can rally support for causes that, while worthy, are otherwise too tedious, dangerous, or expensive to command support on their ownùwar, sacrif
. . .
policy by reversing courses that have failed in the past, and in so doing, they introduce new mistakes (Kaplan 281). Kaplan, who considers himself an intellectual, acknowledges intellectualsÆ ability to form policy and faults intellectuals as a group for not perceiving areas in which they have poor judgment, as well as for applying generalizations without determining whether they were appropriate to particular casesùthe opposite of the practitionersÆ fault (Kaplan 281).
Despite their inherent flaws and tendencies, intellectuals have a propensity for perception and conception that is extremely beneficial in building a country. Intellectuals are the top-down thinkersùthe ones who see the big picture in the midst of myriad confusing details. They can grasp the essence of an issue and can generally see what needs to be done, although from a practical standpoint they may not arrive at the best way to frame the solution. Furthermore, they can identify causes and effects more readily than the nonintellectual. Intellectuals can reason their way through a problem, something not many people seem capable of doing. Although they cannot be guaranteed of arriving at the right solution, or even a workable solution, they can at least dev
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Connections Burke, Discourse Intellectuals, Morton Kaplan, Marx Spencer--shows, Adolph Hitler, Koenigsberg Hitler, Freund Hitler, Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Freund Apparently, public discourse, James BurkeÆs, building country, shaping public, public discourse building, kaplan 281, ideas concepts, intellectual output, discourse building, public opinion, intellectuals tend, shaping public opinion, specific strategies engaging, discourse building country, intellectuals effectively, strategies engaging intellectuals,
Approximate Word count = 3477
Approximate Pages = 14 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Intellectuals in Public Discourse
|