Ideas of The Self
This is an excerpt from the paper...
The concept of the self may be difficult to discuss, since the study of the self may difficult to do objectively, however several sociologists have tried including Charles Cooley, George Herbert Mead, and Erving Goffman, especially in regards to the concept of symbolic interactionism. According to Ritzer (2000), symbolic interactionism came out of the Chicago School of Sociology and is concerned with the development of the self in regards to the interaction of that self with others (p. 28). One of the first developers of this concept, Georg Simmel, believed that understanding the interaction between people was one of the major tasks of sociology.Charles Cooley was considered to be a part of this Chicago school of thought. According to Ritzer (2000), Cooley, like Mead, refused to separate the consciousness of the self from the social context. He believed that the self was developed and shaped on a continuing basis through social interaction. This is known as the "looking-glass self". The second idea developed by Cooley in relationship to the "looking-glass self" was that of the "primary group". The "Primary group" includes those individuals that provide intimate, face-to-face interaction with an individual, and in so doing help develop the "looking-glass self" as it is reflected back from those individuals. This is an especially important concept in regards to the social development of children (p. 50). According to Ritzer (2000), Cooley also tried to get sociologists
. . .
nce and manner. The backstage role is seen as a more truthful type of ôperformanceö. Because there is no audience, other than perhaps the other performers in the team, there is a less focused effort to play a role, although there is still a ôsecondary type of performanceö (Barnhart, 1994, p. 2). It could be that this back role is the most stable of all three performances since it is the more ôtruthfulö.
Outside of the stage, of course, is the audience, which plays of the role of the spectator who is willing to suspend their disbelief and believe that the front roles are actually true. It should be noted that different audiences require different performances, forcing the actors to refocus their front performances accordingly. ôThis allows the team, individual actor, and audience to preserve proper relationships in interaction and the establishments to which interactions belongö (Barnhart, 1994, p. 2).
References
Barnhart, A. (1994). ôErving Goffman: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life.ö Available online at: http://www.cfmc.com/adamb/writings/goffman.htm
Ritzer, G. (2000). Classical Sociological Theory. Third Edition. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Short Response Question 2:
Pierre Bourdieu has been defined as a ôme
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
According Barnhart, Seven Question, Mass Reificationö, According Ritzer, Bourdieu Frankfurt, Wuthnow Witten, According Gartman, Ralph Turner, Florence Nightingale, Giddens Structuration, ritzer 2000, gartman 1991, barnhart 1994, sociological theory, edition boston, virgin mary, boston ma, edition boston ma, according ritzer 2000, response question, according ritzer, charismatic leader, wuthnow witten 1988, classical sociological theory, 2000 classical sociological,
Approximate Word count = 5262
Approximate Pages = 21 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Ideas of The Self
|