Inclusion of Students With Disabilities
This is an excerpt from the paper...
A review of literature was composed of related literature from a variety of sources. First, a selected number of publications, representing in depth research studies were reviewed. Several electronic databases were searched, including ERIC, the Internet, and the Argosy UniversityÆs Embanet system. Inclusion of students with disabilities in regular education classrooms has become a hot topic in the current educational reform, and regular education teachers will play an important role in the educational experiences of the included special students. Because there is an existing relationship between attitudes and behavior, teachersÆ attitudes toward inclusion-related issues will play a significant role of their interactions with included special students, and also influence the quality of these studentsÆ experiences. Regular classroom teachers are responsible for providing an education program for students with disabilities (Strosnider, Lyon, &Gartland, 1997). These teachers are routinely challenged in their efforts to plan for a diverse student population (Blanksby, 1997). As a result of this, inclusion is not a universally accepted concept or practice among educators and educational policy-makers (Fox & Ysseldyke, 1997). Teacher attitude is one of the most important variables in determining the success of innovative programs such as inclusion (Larrivee & Cook, 1979; MacDonald & Hardman, 1989; Parish, Nunn, & Hattrup, 1982; Stoler, 1992). Garvar-Pinhas and Schmelkin (1989
. . .
ities and lessons (Palestis, 1994).
Inclusion
There are a vast number of views on the meaning of inclusion. Due to the different views, inclusion has become a hot topic in the current educational reform. Inclusion means providing a full continuum of service delivering options to all students with special needs (Davis, 1989; Slavin, 1990; West & Idol, 1991). Sydoriak (1996) defines inclusion as ôto participate in and be a part of ô the regular education class (p.40). According to Bricker (1995) and Odom (1996), children with disabilities receiving comprehensive services in a developmentally appropriate program side-by-side with children without disabilities and participating in the same activities, with adaptations to those activities as needed is considered to be a true definition of inclusion. Haas (1993) defined full inclusion as placement of children in regular education classroom who do not have disabilities. Idol (1997) contends inclusion is when a student with special learning and/or behavior needs is educated full-time in the general education program. All students being educated in the mainstream means that every student receives an education in regular education classes (Lusthaus & Forest, 1989).
Smith and Dowdy
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Education Michigan, Education Relevant, Egan Hardman, Bayliss Burden, Head Start, Pioneers Preschool, According Bricker, Preschool Project, Van Patten, Butts Cremin, children disabilities, special education, special education michigan, education michigan, michigan 1997, education teachers, education michigan 1997, rules special, rules special education, head start, perry preschool, revised rules special, revised rules, regular education, special education teachers,
Approximate Word count = 5924
Approximate Pages = 24 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Inclusion of Students With Disabilities
|