Camp David Shuttle Diplomacy

This research reviews negations conducted over the past three decades that had as their central objective development of an effective and lasting accord to bring peace between (a) the Israelis and Palestinians in a narrow context and (b) Israel and Islamic Middle Eastern nation states in a wider context. The scope of the review in this paper extends from the first Camp David negotiations conducted during the Carter Administration through the Camp David II negotiations conducted during the Clinton Administration.

The four primary negotiations were (a) the Camp David Accord in 1979, (b) the Declaration of Principles in 1993 (the Oslo Agreement), (c) the Wye Plantation Agreement in 1998, and the Camp David II Accord in 2000. The Camp David Accord was a negotiated set of principles that provided the framework for the negotiation of a peace treaty between Egypt and Israel (Spiegel 180). The Declaration of Principles was a negotiated agreement on the principles in 1993 that were intended to provide a framework within which Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) could conclude a peace agreement (Feith 32). The Wye Plantation Agreement established a framework for the transfer of more land and autonomy from Israel to the Palestinians in return for a security guarantee from the Palestinians (Bishara 1). The Camp David II negotiations were an effort promoted by United States President Clinton to move the

. . .
wo events led to the present one super power world. The remaining super power, the United States, provides protection and support for Israel. In the earlier two-super power world the Soviet Union provided some sort of balance in the Middle East through support for various Arab regimes. In the present situation, the Palestinians are virtually alone, while Israel continues to have the support of the United States. The United States government repeats platitudes about even-handedness in the Middle East; however, there is not one instance of a vote by the United States in the United Nations Security Council favoring the Palestinians over the Israelis. There are, however, seemingly countless examples of American vetoes of resolutions in the United Nations Security Council that would condemn Israeli actions in the conflict. State identities are necessary in international relations to provide some level of predictability and order. The problem in this context is that it is necessary for other states to perceive a stateÆs identity in the same way that the state perceives its own identity. Israel identifies itself as a peaceful state that wants only security. IsraelÆs neighboring states view Israel as anything but a peaceful state.
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Israelis Palestinians, Gazit Abington, President Clinton, Security Council, Palestinian Authority, Middle East, Israel Palestinians, Israel Natahyahu, Ariel Sharon, Carter United, camp david, middle east, david ii, camp david ii, palestinian authority, israelis palestinians, israeli-palestinian conflict, israeli settlements, peace plan, united nations, israel palestinians, boundaries palestinian authority, camp david negotiations, david ii negotiations, wye plantation agreement,
Approximate Word count = 1506
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)