Theories of Purpose of the Family
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Symbolic interactionists believe that there is no permanent structure to society, and that there are no stable group formations, so there are no stable groups to form prejudices against (Hughes and Kroehler, 2002; Symbolic, 2004). They concentrate on the more changeable, evolving relationships in society. Different groups are seen as products of social interactions. These groups are said to arise when communication channels between different groups are limited and the groups develop different systems of meanings. Symbolic interactions see people as actors who can take on roles according to the situation, and adjust their behavior to what they see in others, so there is no prejudice from this perspective. Prejudice only exists if there are stable norms, and groups of people differ from these norms and are perceived as being different. In symbolic interactionism, role-taking plays a large role, and individuals can take the otherÆs perspective, so they can see a situation from all sides. Symbolic interactionism concentrates on interactions between individuals and not groups, and relationships are in constant flux, so there is no chance for prejudice to develop in any organized way. For instance, there cannot be any racial prejudice according to symbolic interactionism because individuals can take on the role of any race and see the world through the otherÆs eyes, so this type of prejudice, which is common in the world around us, is non-existent for them.
. . .
ith prejudice and discrimination in terms of tension or conflict among competing groups (Hughes and Kroehler, 2002). Those in higher positions are constantly prejudiced against those below them and this breeds continual conflict and tension in society as those in the lower ranks battle for what they believe should be their fair share of the pie.
Prejudice exists in the world around us in the form of the differential pay scales for men and for women performing the same work, and the glass ceiling for women (with a few exceptions), who are limited in the heights to which they can rise in their chosen professions, limits which do not exist for their male counterparts.
Part 1.8
Symbolic interactionists do not believe in the existence of stable norms and values, and so for them there is no meaning to the word ôfamilyö (Symbolic, 2004). They believe in individual relationships which change over time, and the idea of a family suggests a stable, ôsocial institution that unites people in cooperative groups to oversee the bearing and socialization of childrenö (Families, 2005). It involves a social network based on common ancestry and marriage, providing the basic needs of life - food, shelter etc., and involves property-transfer ar
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Hughes Kroehler, American Family, Retrieved Jan, , jan 25 2005, retrieved jan 25, retrieved jan, jan 25, 25 2005, Theories/Conflicthtml Families, norms values, References Conflict, View0/chapter7/chapter_summary Symbolic, hughes kroehler 2002, symbolic interactionism, symbolic interactionists, hughes kroehler, kroehler 2002, Functionalism ParsonÆs, 2005 http//webgrinnelledu/courses/soc/s00/soc111-01/intro, 25 2005 http//webgrinnelledu/courses/soc/s00/soc111-01/intro, perspective family, 2004 retrieved jan,
Approximate Word count = 1477
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Theories of Purpose of the Family
|
Customer Service
to Over
32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
