Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Hate Crime Offenders

This is an excerpt from the paper...

The federal government and most states in the United States have passed laws that distinguish crimes based on prejudice against social groups from other crimes (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 591). These crimes have become known as ôhate crimes.ö Although the exact definition of such crimes vary across states, the term ôhate crimesö usually refers to ôunlawful, violent, destructive or threatening conduct in which the perpetrator is motivated by prejudice toward the victimÆsö racial, ethnic or social group (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 591). Generally, criminologists categorize hate crime offenders into thrill-seekers, mission killers, or reactionists.

Criminological understanding of hate crimes takes several approaches. Some criminologists rely upon the socialization model, which focuses on bigotry and the role of hate crimes as an expression of group conflict (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 591). This approach contends that people who commit hate crimes more often come from a dominant group that attempts to terrorize members of a subordinate group or groups to maintain its dominant position (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 591). This socialization perspective views hate crime offenders as different from other criminals in their likelihood to be ômore calculating and future orientedö than other criminals, whom most criminologists agree are more likely to be impulsive and lacking in self-control (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 592).

The socialization perspective also contends th

. . .
e victimized group by participate because of peer influence (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 593). Essentially, the versatile offender approach contends that hate crime offenders choose their victims because these victims û homosexuals, immigrants, blacks - are seen as ôweakerö and, therefore, more vulnerable. In this way, the approach contends that hate crime offenders are more similar to than different from other criminals (Messner et. al., 2004, p. 593). Under this model, criminologists further classify hate crime offenders into ôthrill-seekers.ö Thrill-seekers, who make up the largest group of hate crime offenders, are often young people who commit hate crimes because of boredom, to have fun, and to feel strong (Steinberg et. al., 2003, p. 981). The case of racist skinhead John Butler demonstrates that a person convicted of a hate crime can share characteristics from more than one criminological model. In 2003, John Butler was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death for the July 1998 murders of Lin Newborn and Daniel Shersty (Gaynor, 2003, p. 1). A jury found that Butler had lured Shersty and Newborn into the Las Vegas desert and then shot and killed them. At the time of their deaths, Shersty was a 21-year-old Nellis
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Schafer Navarro, Crime Offenders, Shersty NewbornÆs, Evidence ButlerÆs, Richard Bridges, Bridges Butler, Joey Justin, INS SHARP, Shersty Newborn, hate crime, Shersty Butler, crime offenders, hate crime offenders, butler 2004, et al, messner et al, al 2004, et al 2004, messner et, hate crimes, navarro 2003, 2003 3, navarro 2003 3, schafer navarro, schafer navarro 2003,
Approximate Word count = 2119
Approximate Pages = 8 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2008 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$