Chinese Assimilation in New York
This is an excerpt from the paper...
Three research questions addressed by Zhou and Logan are stated in the first paragraph of their paper on residential mobility by residents of Chinatown in New York City: (1) the question of the overall scale of segregation of New York's Chinese from other social groups; (2) the degree to which decentralization and suburbanization (i.e., moving out of Chinatown) are linked to lower-level segregation; and (3) the characteristics of individual householders that are linked to decentralization and the general residential direction that these characteristics make them point. Noting that previous studies of ethnic-minority social patterns predict "gradual but progressive assimilation," the authors inevitably also intend to interrogate the adequacy of the theoretical model of research into full minority-group inclusion in society, in light of the unique characteristics of the Chinatown enclave in New York, which "has survived for more than 140 years and retains a strong ethnic economy" (389). Patterns of social mobility have been studied in the past via models attempting to account for minority-group residential behavior and individual behavior of group members. Zhou and Logan cite research into European ethnic minority assimilations but note that it may not necessarily apply to more recent immigrant groups. They also observe that one 1987 study (Massey and Denton), which linked suburbanization to assimilation for Asians and Hispanics, did not sufficiently account for
. . .
re examined to calculate an index of (ethnic) dissimilarity of residence distribution between Chinese and other ethnic groups that had a representation of more than 50 households in any given census tract. Householders only, age 25 or older, were counted to avoid double counting of residents in the same household. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify the odds of Chinese householders living outside or inside New York City and living in the outer boroughs or Manhattan. The measure of these conditions constituted the two dependent variables of the study. Independent variables (predictor variables in this study because they were measured and not manipulated) characteristic of householders were socioeconomic status (years of education, household income, and occupation); sectoral (enclave) employment; acculturation (English ability, U.S. citizenship, and year of immigration); age; marital status; children under 17 in household.
The big picture of the findings was that, for the Chinese of New York City, socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and residential proximity to non-Hispanic whites were the greatest predictors of decentralized residency. Employment in the enclave had no positive or negative effect amon
. . .
Some common words found in the essay are:
Zhou Logan, York City, York's Chinese, Conversely Chinese, York's Chinatown, Asians Hispanics, Jersey Census, Analysis Census, Portes Jensen, Zhou Logan's, zhou logan, york city, socioeconomic status, residential mobility, ethnic chinese, sociological review 52, outside enclave, population housing, based 1980, assimilation theory, census population, based 1980 census, assimilation enclave models, review 52 1987, american sociological review,
Approximate Word count = 1549
Approximate Pages = 6 (250 words per page)
More Essays on Chinese Assimilation in New York
|