Create a new account

It's simple, and free.

Traditional Versus Constructivist Teaching Methods

ching method have the potential to result in successful learning for students (Travis and Lord 12). The constructivist approach empowers the student to become self-directed but this method is more time consuming and has the potential to be problem in a crowded classroom with little time for the use of new methods of teaching (Kumar 247). Kumar related Dewey's views that students require a continuous process that allows them to reconstruct experiences and without this opportunity, there is a distortion or arrest of growth of a further experience. This is the principle of continuity, a principle in line with the constructivist design that provides the learner with a continuum of education experiences. The traditional methods focus on instructional goals such as defining concepts, recalling facts, generalizations, and performing procedures; and the constructivist methods focus on reasoning, social negotiation, critical thinking, self-regulation, and mindful reflection. This approach is applied to the regular and e-learning environment (Almala 9).

There are specific epistemological assumptions and approaches to teaching with each of these methods. The teaching-centered approach has an empiricist epistemological assumption and believes that knowledge is gained by observing the world (Yuen and Hau 280). Y

...

< Prev Page 2 of 7 Next >

More on Traditional Versus Constructivist Teaching Methods...

Loading...
APA     MLA     Chicago
Traditional Versus Constructivist Teaching Methods. (1969, December 31). In LotsofEssays.com. Retrieved 05:29, April 23, 2024, from https://www.lotsofessays.com/viewpaper/2000213.html