This case analysis explores key issues related to the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in the context of poor individuals living in the United States and in a developing country such as Venezuela. It offers an overview of government programming in the United States and Venezuela that targets treatment and intervention programs for HIV/AIDS.
The literature suggests that HAART is an effective treatment protocol that can retard the progression of HIV, sustain life, and offset AIDS symptomology. However, HAART is generally delivered only under conditions wherein clinical and laboratory infrastructure is seen as sufficient to provide for the close monitoring of patients' compliance with the therapeutic regimen. HAART is a costly and complex treatment protocol and there is evidence of some resistance on the part of HIV patients' immune systems to its influence.
Efforts to enhance the accessibility of this treatment strategy are highly recommended but there are many barriers to implementing a broad-based global HAART treatment and intervention strategy. The study draws upon the literature to emphasize the necessity of creating a more comprehensive approach to addressing the resource deficits of both individuals and service providers who are coping with the AIDS pandemic.
This case analysis first compares and contrasts the economic, social, and political factors that determine how HIV/AIDS is treated in the United States and in Venezuela. Secondly, it examines the case of Jose and Maria, illegal residents of the U.S. and legal residents of developing countries who may or may not receive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and primary case management. Finally, the analysis discusses why access to HAART has become a global health concern.
Factors Influencing HIV/AIDS Treatment
In the United States, the anti-AIDS program is funded via President George W. Bush's landmark $15 billion...