The issue of drunk driving will be with us for as long as automobiles have human operators. When a driver gets into a car and proceeds to drive on a public road, the issue of his or her agency suddenly jumps from a private realm to a public realm. Driving is a massive collective-action game in which players rely on their senses as well as social norms to guide them to their destination. Philosophically, driving is often experienced as a "liminal" state of being in which time spent in transit is experienced as ambiguous, open, and indeterminate; neither "here nor there." As such, people see driving as an "in-between" process that is not an end in itself. Seeing driving as liminal makes it susceptible to people believing that they can carry-on their behaviors and engagements from the beginning destination to their final destination. For many people, the movement from Christmas party to After party is simply seen as the next leg of the party. For this reason, laws exist governing the behavior of drunk driving. By raising the stakes of driving drunk through criminal charges, heavy fines, and jail time, the State has been successful in curbing drunk driving accidents and related casualties to some degree. "The cornerstone of all efforts to reduce the problem of alcohol-impaired driving is state laws making driving with high BACs illegal" (Coben et al, 2009). Today, the most common BAC limit is 0.10 % BAC, but some states are pushing to have the limit lowered to 0.08% (Ross, 1994). Nevertheless, the problem of drunk driving remains widespread in the culture. This is principally due to Americans not seeing driving as an end in itself, which may require a truncation of the behavior being engaged in prior to getting into the drivers seat. The most effective way to convince all Americans that driving is an end in itself is for states to pass laws which prescribe the death penalty for second-time drunk driving incidents and reckles...