Members
Login
Sign Up!!!
Categories
Arts
Business
Custom Research
Economics
Film
Foreign
Government and Law
History
Literature
Medical
Miscellaneous
People
Personal Essays
Philosophy
Psychology
Science and Technology

Support
FAQ
Customer Service
Site Search

     Home Customer Service Acceptable Use Policy Site Search

     Enter Search Topic:
 

Already a member? Go here to log in and view the entire paper!

Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Join Now!
by: Online Check
Membership Benefits

Conflict between Abelard and St. Bernard

This is an excerpt from the paper...

I. The conflict between Abelard and St. Bernard, and other champions of orthodoxy in faith, which came to a head at the Councils of Soissons and Sens, was on its most fundamental level a conflict between two interpretations of the nature of faith. These interpretations may, broadly and loosely, be called the subtle and the simple. The subtle interpretation of faith holds that God, in all His mystery and complexity, is visible in His handiwork, and that therefore every attempt to understand that mystery and complexity--for example, the mystery and complexity of contradictions found in the writings of various Church Fathers--must bring us closer to God, and therefore inspire in us a fuller and deeper faith. "Faith through questioning" might be called the essense of this approach.

Bernard, in contrast, held to a simple (and therefore unquestioning) interpretation of faith; raising questions and complexities, in Bernard's view, could only lead to uncertainty and thence to doubt, while the insistent questioning of received authority threatened the entire structure, and therefore the (simple) teaching mission of the Church. In some respects, the difference between Abelard and Bernard can be regarded a conflict of the theoretical and the practical or political. In Abelard's view, every idea and every question was fair game for analysis. There is no reason to believe that his analysis led him anywhere in the end than back to a stronger orthodoxy. In his Confession of Faith, w

. . .
at their spirituality and in the way that they expressed them than Heloise and St. Francis of Assisi. Yet each of them, in their very different ways, made significant contributions to the growth of the medieval Church, and their ways that their very different personalities and contributions were integrated into the fabric of the Church is powerful testimony to the power and flexibility of medieval Catholicism as both institution and system of faith. Heloise was that not infrequent figure in the Middle Ages, the unwilling nun, though the path by which she reached the cloister was anything but the usual one. Most women who were forced into convents got there because they were embarrassing or inconvenient to someone, or simply because their families either lacked a suitable dowry for them or judged them not sufficiently attractive to be marriageable. In a sense, it can be said that Heloise found herself in a novice's habit for the first of these reasons; Abelard first parked her in a convent as protection of a sort from Fulbert, then--for reasons not entirely clear--pressured her into taking vows (Letters 19-20). Whatever his intention, this was among other things likely the immediate reason for the revenge that Fulbert wrough
. . .

Some common words found in the essay are:
Council Sens, Middle Ages, Benedictine Rule, Renaissance Italian, Francis Assisi, Church Fathers--must, Soissons Sens, Teresa Avila, Confession Faith, Abelard Bernard, francis assisi, medieval church, interpretation faith, st francis assisi, middle ages, sexual passion, god's fool, mystery complexity, st francis, confession faith, disappointed love,
Approximate Word count = 1805
Approximate Pages = 7 (250 words per page)

Membership Benefits
Click here to Join Now!
by: Credit Card
Click here to Join Now!
by: Online Check






to Over 32,000 Professionally Written Papers!!!
 


All papers are for research and reference purposes only!
Copyright © 2009 LotsOfEssays.com
All rights reserved. Webmasters make $$$ NEW